Proposition 65
August 8, 2007
In the case Brimer v. Lion Supermarket, et al., the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on August 8, 2007. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendant Lion Supermarket ("Lion") sold glass bottles and other glassware with colored artwork containing the heavy metal lead on the exterior in the State of California...
December 19, 2005
Lifetime Brands, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Lifetime Brands, Inc., Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
April 12, 2006
The Lang Companies, LLC elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, The Lang Companies, LLC
May 5, 2006
Lab Safety Supply, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on May 5, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Lab Safety Supply, Inc., Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
April 6, 2006
Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 6, 2006 . In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
June 1, 2007
The Honorable Paul H. Alvarado from the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Konocti Harbor Resort & Spa, et al., on June 1, 2007. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that defendant Konocti Harbor Resort & Spa ("Konocti") sold shooters and other glassware with colored artwork containing the heavy...
November 29, 2005
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in the case of Brimer v. Kohl's Corporation, et al. on November 29, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendant Kohl's Corporation ("Kohl's") manufactured, distributed, and/or sold certain glass containers intended to hold beverages with colored artwork,...
December 19, 2005
Knott’s Berry Farm and Cedar Fair, L.P. (collectively “Knotts Berry Farm”) elected to address their Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 19, 2005. In doing so, Knotts Berry Farm became a member of...
Boelter, Cadmium, Cedar Fair, L.P., Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Knott's Berry Farm, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
December 15, 2005
The Kitchen Collection, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 15, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, The Kitchen Collection, Inc.
January 11, 2006
Kikkoman Foods, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 11, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Kikkoman Foods, Inc., Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
Search Our Site
Subscribe to Our Blogs
Sign up for our newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest important news from The Chanler Group
Contact Our Team
Use our online contact form, or visit our offices page for more details on how to reach us.
Want to apply for a grant? Check out our Grant Seeker FAQ.
If you want to contact a whistleblower attorney, please take a look at our Whistleblower Questionnaire.