Proposition 65
June 19, 2006
Interex Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 19, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Interex Corporation, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
December 19, 2005
Innovage, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Innovage Distribution, Inc., Innovage, Inc., Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
May 11, 2005
In a May 11, 2005 settlement, Proposition 65 private enforcer, Dr. Whitney Leeman, and glassware manufacturers, Indiana Glass Company and Lancaster Colony Corporation, entered an agreement resolving pending litigation and Leeman's claim that the IGC violated Proposition 65. Leeman commenced the action on September 3, 2004, when she served IGC with a 60-day notice of...
Cadmium, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Indiana Glass Company, Lancaster Colony Corporation, Lead, Leeman, Proposition 65
June 26, 2006
The Import Collection elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 26, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, The Import Collection, Inc.
November 18, 2005
Image West Apparel, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 18, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Boelter, Cadmium, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Image West Apparel, Inc., Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
January 11, 2006
IKEA U.S. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 11, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium from...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, IKEA U.S., Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
December 20, 2006
The San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Hyler Enterprises, Inc. on December 20, 2006. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendant Hyler Enterprises, Inc ("Hyler") sold wine glasses and other glassware and mugs and other ceramicware with colored artwork on the exterior containing the heavy metal...
Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Hyler Enterprises, Inc., Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
September 22, 2005
On September 22, 2005, Russell Brimer and Hunter Manufacturing Group, Inc. reached a settlement agreement that resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that Hunter manufactured, distributed or sold glasses, mugs, bowls, teapots and other glassware and ceramicware with colored designs and/or artwork on the exterior containing lead and cadmium in the State of...
Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Hunter Manufacturing Group, Inc., Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
June 19, 2006
Hudson Group elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 19, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Hudson Group, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
March 9, 2005
The Superior Court of California City and County of San Francisco entered a Consent Judgment on March 9, 2005 in the matter of Leeman v. Houston Harvest Gift Products LLC, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Dr. Whitney R. Leeman's allegations that the defendant Houston Harvest sold tableware with colored artwork or designs (containing lead) on the exterior, and...
Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Houston Harvest Gift Products LLC, Lead, Leeman, Proposition 65
Search Our Site
Subscribe to Our Blogs
Sign up for our newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest important news from The Chanler Group
Contact Our Team
Use our online contact form, or visit our offices page for more details on how to reach us.
Want to apply for a grant? Check out our Grant Seeker FAQ.
If you want to contact a whistleblower attorney, please take a look at our Whistleblower Questionnaire.