Proposition 65
December 19, 2005
Ozeki Sake (U.S.A.) Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Boelter, Cadmium, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Ozeki Sake (U.S.A.) Inc., Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
February 6, 2006
Orrefors Kosta Boda, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
Boelter, Cadmium, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Orrefors Kosta Boda, Inc., Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
April 12, 2006
Oriental Trading Company, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Oriental Trading Company, Inc., Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
February 6, 2006
Oneida Ltd. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
December 27, 2005
Oddity, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 27, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Oddity, Inc., Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
July 25, 2007
The San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Leeman v. Nugget Market, Inc., et al., on July 25, 2007. In this enforcement action, citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D. alleged that defendants Nugget Market, Inc. and Stille Company (collectively "Nugget") sold glass soda bottles, oil bottles and other glassware and mugs and other...
Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Leeman, Nugget Market, Inc., Proposition 65, Stille Company
November 22, 2005
notNeutral, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 22, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, notNeutral, Inc., Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
June 19, 2006
North American Trading Company, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 19, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Lead, North American Trading Company, Inc., Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
November 25, 2005
Norpro elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium from...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Norpro, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
April 6, 2006
Norman Vineyards, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 6, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Boelter, Cadmium, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Norman Vineyards, Inc., Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
Search Our Site
Subscribe to Our Blogs
Sign up for our newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest important news from The Chanler Group
Contact Our Team
Use our online contact form, or visit our offices page for more details on how to reach us.
Want to apply for a grant? Check out our Grant Seeker FAQ.
If you want to contact a whistleblower attorney, please take a look at our Whistleblower Questionnaire.