Proposition 65
May 5, 2006
Skyy Spirits LLC elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on May 5, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
Boelter, Cadmium, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Skyy Spirits LLC
September 27, 2007
The Solano County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on September 27, 2007, when the Honorable Franklin R. Taft granted the parties' motion to approve the Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Six Flags Theme Park, Inc., et al. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that defendant Six Flags Theme Park, Inc. ("Six Flags") sold glassware and/or...
Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Six Flags Theme Park, Inc.
May 29, 2007
Citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations against defendants Shun Fat Supermarket, Inc. and SF Supermarket, Inc. (collectively "Shun Fat") were resolved on May 29, 2007, when the Sacramento County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Shun Fat Supermarket, Inc., et al. In this matter, Brimer alleged that Shun Fat sold rice bowls and other...
Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, SF Supermarket, Inc., Shun Fat Supermarket, Inc.
August 9, 2006
Sherwood Brands, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on August 9, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Sherwood Brands, Inc.
December 15, 2005
Shemran, Inc. (d/b/a Barons Marketplace) elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 15, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate...
Boelter, Cadmium, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Shemran, Inc. (d/b/a Barons Marketplace)
December 27, 2005
See’s Candy Shops, Incorporated/See’s Candies, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 27, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, See's Candy Shops, Incorporated
June 3, 2005
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Leeman v. Sears Roebuck and Co., et al., on June 3, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman's allegations that defendant Sears Roebuck and Co. ("Sears") distributed and/or sold certain tumblers, stemware, and other glassware with colored artwork or designs containing lead on the...
August 1, 2007
The Honorable Frank Roesch entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Screen–It Graphics of Lawrence, Inc., et al. on August 1, 2007. In this enforcement action, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that defendants Screen–It Graphics of Lawrence, Inc. and Grandstand Sportsware and Glassware (collectively “Screen-It”) sold pilsner glasses and other...
Glass Food & Beverage Products, Grandstand Sportsware And Glassware, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Screen
December 31, 2005
Save Mart Supermarkets (dba Save Mart and Food Maxx) elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 31, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Save Mart Supermarkets (dba Save Mart and Food Maxx)
November 1, 2005
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Santa Barbara Ceramic Design, et al., on November 1, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendant Santa Barbara Ceramic Design ("Santa Barbara") manufactured, distributed, and/or sold certain oil bottles and other glassware products with colored artwork,...
Cadmium, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Santa Barbara Ceramic Design
Search Our Site
Subscribe to Our Blogs
Sign up for our newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest important news from The Chanler Group
Contact Our Team
Use our online contact form, or visit our offices page for more details on how to reach us.
Want to apply for a grant? Check out our Grant Seeker FAQ.
If you want to contact a whistleblower attorney, please take a look at our Whistleblower Questionnaire.