Proposition 65
March 28, 2005
Citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations against the settling party Van Group, Inc. were resolved on March 28, 2005, when the parties entered an out-of-court settlement agreement. Brimer alleged that Van sold decorated glassware containing the heavy metals lead and cadmium in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.
As part of...
March 15, 2007
In the case of Brimer v. Valley Han Kook Market, et al., the Honorable Tricia Ann Bigelow of the Los Angeles County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on March 15, 2007. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendant, Valley Han Kook Market ("Valley"), sold glassware with colored artwork on the exterior containing the heavy metal...
January 11, 2006
VA Software Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 11, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, VA Software Corporation
November 10, 2005
V. Sattui Winery elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 10, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, V. Sattui Winery
December 21, 2007
Whistleblower Russell Brimer's allegations regarding the defendant, U.S. Trading Co., Inc. ("U.S. Trading"), were resolved on December 21, 2007, when the Honorable David Hunter granted the parties' motion to approve the Consent Judgment in Brimer v. U.S. Trading Co., Inc., et al. In this matter, Brimer alleged that U.S. Trading sold jars and other glassware...
January 12, 2006
In the case Brimer v. Universal Screen Arts, Inc.; et al. the Honorable James L. Warren entered a Consent Judgment on January 12, 2006. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendants Universal Screen Arts, Inc., Signals Catalogue Corp., Lillian Vernon Corporation, Casual Living USA, Inc., and RedEnvelope, Inc. (collectively "Defendants")...
Cadmium, Casual Living USA, Inc., Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Home Decorative Products, Lead, Lead Crystal, Lillian Vernon Corporation, Proposition 65, RedEnvelope, Inc., Russell Brimer, Signals Catalogue Corp., Universal Screen Arts, Inc.
December 21, 2006
The Honorable Ronald E. Quidachay, on December 21, 2006, approved the parties' Consent Judgment in Brimer v. UncommonGoods, LLC, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant UncommonGoods, LLC, sold glassware, containers, and glass candle holders containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the...
Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Home Decorative Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, UncommonGoods, LLC
December 28, 2005
Two's Company, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 28, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Two's Company, Inc.
January 9, 2008
Citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D. and settling party Turner Retail, Inc. (“Turner”) entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement on January 9, 2008, resolving Leeman’s allegations that Turner sold glassware and ceramicware with colored artwork containing the heavy metal lead on the exterior in the State of California without providing the...
Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Leeman, Proposition 65, Turner Retail, Inc.
January 31, 2006
Tuesday Morning, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 31, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, Tuesday Morning, Inc.
Search Our Site
Subscribe to Our Blogs
Sign up for our newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest important news from The Chanler Group
Contact Our Team
Use our online contact form, or visit our offices page for more details on how to reach us.
Want to apply for a grant? Check out our Grant Seeker FAQ.
If you want to contact a whistleblower attorney, please take a look at our Whistleblower Questionnaire.