Wine Things Unlimited Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 16, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
WinCo Foods, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 19, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
Winchester Mystery House Gift Shop LLC elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 28, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
The San Francisco County Superior County entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Whole Foods Market, Inc., et al. on December 28, 2007. In this enforcement action, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that defendants Whole Foods Market, California, Inc., Whole Foods Market, Inc., and Herman Dodge & Son, Inc. (collectively "Whole Foods") sold ceramicware and...
West Marine Products, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
In the case Brimer v. Wells Manufacturing USA Inc.; et al., the Honorable James L. Warren entered a Consent Judgment on January 12, 2006. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendants Wells Manufacturing USA Inc.; Wells Manufacturing, Inc.; and the May Department Stores Company (collectively "Wells") sold glassware with colored artwork...
On August 22, 2001, Proposition 65 private enforcer, Russel Brimer, and manufacturer of crystal and glassware products, Wells Mfg., Inc., agreed to settlement terms that resolve pending litigation, and Brimer's allegation that Wells violated Proposition 65 when it sold wine glasses, goblets, and other glassware with exterior decorations containing lead and cadmium in...
Whistleblower Laurence Vinocur resolved his allegations against the defendant Joovy Holding Co. (“Joovy”) in the case Vinocur v. Joovy Holding Co. when the parties executed a Consent Judgment on February 13, 2014. In this enforcement action, Vinocur alleged that Joovy sold foam cushioned high chairs containing the flame retardant tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl)...
Warwick’s Stationers elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 26, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Walong Marketing, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 19, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
