False Claims Act

New Calif. False Claims Act Meets Conditions for 10% Higher Award

May 31, 2013

Recent amendments to the federal False Claims Act have expanded whistleblower protections and increased penalties for violators.  The amendments came in the form of the federal Deficit Reduction Act, the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act, the Affordable Care Act, and the Dodd-Frank Act.

California revamped its own False Claims Act earlier this year to bring it into compliance with federal law—and qualify for a 10 percent increase in its share of False Claims Act recoveries in cases relating to the submission of false or fraudulent claims to California’s State Medicaid program.  If a State obtains a recovery as a result of a State false claims action relating to fraudulent claims under the State Medicaid program, it must share the recovery with the federal government in the same proportion as the matching funds provided by the federal government for the state’s Medicaid program, called the federal medical assistance percentage. However, when states, such as California, enact state False Claims laws that are in compliance with federal law, those states get to keep an additional 10% of the recovery, thus sharing 10% less of any recovery in proportion to the federal medical assistance percentage.

For example, if the federal medical assistance percentage for a state is 60%, then the state would retain 40% of the recovery and the federal government would be entitled to the remaining 60% of the recovery.  But if the state has its own False Claims Act that is in compliance with federal law, that state would retain 50% of the recovery, and the federal government would receive the remaining 50%.

Under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the U.S. and California False Claims Acts, a private citizen with knowledge of fraud can sue on behalf of the government and claim a share in the recovery.  Many state and federal probes into Medicare and Medicaid fraud, and government contract fraud are initiated by whistleblower complaints. 

New York’s False Claims Act law was determined to no longer be in compliance with federal law.  New York has since submitted a revised statute to the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and awaits word on whether the revised statute meets federal requirements and qualifies for the 10% incentive.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

ISTA Settles Healthcare Fraud Claims for $33.5M; Whistleblower to get $2.5M

May 28, 2013

ISTA Pharmaceuticals has pleaded guilty to federal felony charges of conspiracy to introduce a misbranded drug into interstate commerce and conspiracy to pay illegal remuneration in violation of the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the U.S. Department of Justice announced last week.  In addition to criminal fines and asset forfeiture, ISTA has also entered into a civil settlement for knowingly submitting or causing the submission of false claims to federal health care programs.

Under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), it is illegal for a drug company to introduce into interstate commerce any drug that the company intends will be used for purposes not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).  Xibrom is approved by the FDA to treat pain and inflammation following cataract surgery; however, some ISTA employees promoted Xibrom for unapproved new uses, including the use of Xibrom following Lasik and glaucoma surgeries, and for the treatment and prevention of cystoid macular edema.  Some ISTA employees were told by management not to write down certain interactions with physicians regarding unapproved new uses, and not to leave certain printed materials in physicians' offices relating to unapproved new uses, in order to avoid detection.

ISTA also pled guilty to a conspiracy to knowingly and willfully offer or pay remuneration to physicians to induce those physicians to prescribe Xibrom, in violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute.  Certain ISTA employees provided physicians with free Vitrase, another ISTA product, with the intent to induce such physicians to refer individuals to pharmacies for Xibrom.  ISTA also provided other illegal remuneration, including sponsoring an event for a non-profit group associated with a particular physician, a golf outing, a wine-tasting event, paid consulting or speaker arrangements, and honoraria for participation in advisory meetings which were intended to be marketing opportunities.  ISTA agreed to pay $18 million to the federal government under the terms of its plea agreement.

ISTA also agreed to pay $15 million to resolve civil allegations regarding its marketing of Xibrom, which caused false claims to be submitted to government health care programs.  The United States alleged that ISTA's violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute resulted in false claims being submitted to federal health care programs.

In addition to the above, ISTA’s parent company, Bausch+Lomb (B+L), has also agreed to enter into a corporate integrity agreement to prevent future violations.

The lawsuit was originally filed by two whistleblowers under the False Claims Act.  One of the whistleblowers, Keith Schenkel, was a former employee of ISTA.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud to sue on behalf of the government and share in the recovery.  Schenkel will receive $2.5 million as his share of the civil settlement.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Parkland Hospital Settles Healthcare Fraud Allegations for $1.4M

May 24, 2013

Parkland Memorial Hospital of Dallas, Texas has agreed to pay a $1.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that they knowingly submitted or caused the submission of false claims to Medicare and Medicaid, the Dallas Morning News reported recently.  Parkland has also agreed to enter into a corporate integrity agreement with federal health regulators to monitor future claims, bills, clinical quality, patient safety, ethics, and compliance.  This represents the fourth time the government has prosecuted Parkland in recent years, according to the Dallas Morning News.

Parkland allegedly submitted claims for rehabilitation consultations that were never ordered and that exposed some patients to risk of further injury.  Medical residents also allegedly performed certain procedures without the required supervision.

The lawsuit was originally filed by Dr. Lien Kyri, formerly a medical resident at Parkland Memorial Hospital, under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud to sue on the behalf of the government and receive a share of the recovery.  Dr. Kyri’s share of the settlement has not yet been determined.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

U.S. Renal Settles False Claims for $7.3M; Whistleblower to Get $1.3M

May 21, 2013

Texas-based U.S. Renal Care has agreed to pay $7.3 million to resolve allegations that their subsidiary, Dialysis Corporation of America (DCA), violated the False Claims Act by knowingly submitting false claims to the Medicare program for more medication than was actually administered to dialysis patients, the U.S. Department of Justice announced today.

Epogen is an intravenous medication that is used to treat anemia, a common condition afflicting patients with end-stage renal disease.  Epogen vials contain a small amount of medication in excess of the labeled amount, known as “overfill,” to compensate for medication that may remain in the vial after extraction and in the syringe upon administration.  The United States contends that DCA billed for 10‑11% overfill whenever it administered Epogen; however, the types of syringes DCA used did not allow DCA to withdraw and administer 10‑11% overfill every time it administered Epogen to patients.  Thus, DCA submitted false claims to Medicare that overstated the amount of Epogen that it was actually providing.

The lawsuit was originally filed by Laura Davis, a nurse at one of DCA’s facilities, under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud to sue on behalf of the government and claim a share in the recovery.  Davis will receive $1,314,000 as part of the settlement.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Ranbaxy Settles False Claims Allegations for $500M; Whistleblower to Get $48.6M

May 17, 2013

In the largest drug safety settlement of its kind to date, generic drug manufacturer Ranbaxy USA Inc. pleaded guilty to felony charges relating to the manufacture and distribution of adulterated drugs, as well as violation of the False Claims Act, the U.S. Department of Justice announced this week.  Ranbaxy agreed to pay a criminal fine and forfeiture amounting to $150 million and another $350 million for the False Claims Act violations.

Ranbaxy admitted to distributing certain batches of adulterated drugs made at two of Ranbaxy’s manufacturing facilities in India, including Sotret, an acne medication; gabapentin, a drug used to treat epilepsy and nerve pain; and ciprofloxacin, a broad-spectrum antibiotic.  Under the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), a drug is adulterated if the methods used in, or the facilities or controls used for, its manufacturing, processing, packing, or holding do not conform to, or are not operated or administered in conformity with, current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) regulations.  Ranbaxy acknowledged that Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspections found incomplete testing records, inadequate stability programs, and cGMP deviations in the manufacture of certain active pharmaceutical ingredients and finished products.

Ranbaxy also failed to file timely “field alerts” to the FDA for batches of drugs that had failed certain tests.  Ranbaxy admitted to making false, fictitious, and fraudulent statements to the FDA regarding the dates of stability tests and failed to conduct stability tests at prescribed intervals, resulting in unreliable test results regarding the shelf life of the drugs.  

The United States contends that Ranbaxy knowingly caused false claims to be submitted to Medicaid, Medicare, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and other federally funded healthcare programs.

The suit was originally filed by Dinesh Thakur, a former Ranbaxy executive, under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows a private citizen with knowledge of fraud to sue on behalf of the government and share in the recovery.  Thakur will receive approximately $48.6 million from the federal share of the settlement amount.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

C.R. Bard to Pay $48.26M Settlement; Whistleblower to Get $10M

May 16, 2013

New Jersey-based C.R. Bard has agreed to pay the U.S. government $48.26 million to resolve allegations that it knowingly caused false claims to be submitted to Medicare for brachytherapy seeds used to treat prostate cancer, the U.S. Department of Justice announced this week.

The United States alleged that from 1998 to 2006, Bard violated the Anti-Kickback Statute when the company provided illegal remuneration to customers and physicians to induce them to purchase Bard’s seeds, in the form of certain grants, guaranteed minimum rebates, conference fees, marketing assistance and/or free medical equipment.  Hospitals ultimately submitted bills to Medicare for these seeds, which the government alleged were rendered false by Bard’s illegal kickback activity. The government alleged that Bard was liable under the False Claims Act for causing the submission of those false claims.

The lawsuit was filed by Julie Darity, a former Bard manager for brachytherapy contracts administration, under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud to sue on behalf of the government and share in the recovery.  Darity will receive a little over $10 million as her share of the civil settlement.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Jury Finds Tuomey Healthcare Violated False Claims Act With $40M in Kickbacks

May 9, 2013

A federal jury has found South Carolina-based Tuomey Healthcare System violated the Stark Law and the False Claims Act when it collected nearly $40 million in fraudulent Medicare claims, reported Sumter, S.C.’s The Item.

Tuomey Healthcare System was accused of signing 19 doctors to lucrative part-time contracts that paid well above fair market value in order to continue to receive the referral fees associated with those doctors’ procedures.  Paying doctors out of their referral fees constitutes an illegal kickback under Medicare law, and the U.S. government sought to recover all of the Medicare claims filed as a result of procedures performed by those 19 doctors between 2005 and 2009.

The lawsuit was originally filed by Dr. Michael Drakeford under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act, which allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud to sue on behalf of the government and share in a portion of the recovery.  Drakeford’s share of the reward has yet to be determined, but according to The Item, he has said that his portion of the award will go toward charitable health care efforts in the Sumter community.

The settlement amount, including fees, fines, and penalties, has yet to be determined.  Tuomey has 28 days to file an appeal.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Adventist Health Settles False Claims Charges for $14M; Whistleblowers to Get $2.8M

May 7, 2013

Adventist Health and its Los Angeles-based affiliated hospital White Memorial Medical Center have agreed to pay the United States and the State of California $14.1 million to settle allegations that they violated the Anti-Kickback Act, the Stark Statute, and the False Claims Act, the U.S. Department of Justice announced last week.

Adventist Health allegedly improperly compensated physicians who referred patients to the White Memorial facility by transferring assets, including medical and non-medical supplies and inventory, at less than fair market value.  Referring physicians also allegedly received compensation at above fair market value for providing teaching services at White Memorial’s family practice residency program.  The United States alleged that these payments violated the Anti-Kickback Act and Stark Statute, and by extension, the False Claims Act. The Anti-Kickback Act prohibits offering, paying, soliciting or receiving remuneration to induce referrals of items or services covered by Medicare, Medicaid and/or other federally-funded programs.  The Stark Statute prohibits a hospital from submitting claims for patient referrals made by a physician with whom the hospital has an improper financial arrangement.  By extension, White Memorial Medical Center violated the False Claims Act when it knowingly caused the submission of false claims to Medicare and/or Medicaid for patients who were referred to the hospital because of the kickbacks and not legitimate patient need.

As part of the settlement, White Memorial has entered into a comprehensive five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to ensure its continued compliance with federal health care benefit program requirements.

The lawsuit was originally filed by Dr. Hector Luque and Dr. Alejandro Gonzalez under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud to sue on behalf of the United States and share in a portion of the recovery.  Luque and Gonzalez will receive approximately $2.8 million as their share of the recovery in this case.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

U.S. Files 2nd Complaint Against Novartis Re: Kickbacks to Prescribing Doctors

May 1, 2013

The United States filed a second false claims action against Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. alleging that they paid kickbacks to doctors to induce them to prescribe Novartis pharmaceutical products that were reimbursed by federal health care programs, the Justice Department announced last week.

The government alleges that from January 2001 through November 2011, Novartis systematically violated the Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits payment of remuneration to induce referrals of items or services covered by Medicare, Medicaid, and other federally funded programs.  Novartis allegedly violated its own internal policies concerning speaker programs, which require that the programs have an educational purpose and that slides about the company’s drugs be presented.  Novartis allegedly violated the Anti-Kickback Statute by paying doctors to speak about certain drugs, including its hypertension drugs Lotrel and Valturna and its diabetes drug Starlix, at events that were often little or nothing more than social occasions for the doctors.  The payments and lavish dinners given to the doctors were, in reality, kickbacks to the speakers and attendees to induce them to write prescriptions for Novartis drugs.  In many instances Novartis made payments to doctors for purported speaker programs that either did not occur at all or that had few or no attendees, and thousands of programs were held all over the country at which few or no slides were shown and the doctors who participated spent little or no time discussing the drug at issue.

The government claims that Novartis was well aware that its speaker programs created opportunities to provide kickbacks to doctors.  In September 2010, Novartis entered into a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice to settle False Claims Act lawsuits based in part on violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute due to illegal remuneration paid to doctors through such mechanisms as speaker programs, and signed a corporate integrity agreement with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General agreeing to implement a rigorous compliance program.  Nonetheless, even after entering into the corporate integrity agreement, Novartis’s compliance program allegedly failed to prevent kickbacks from being paid in conjunction with Novartis’s speaker programs.

As a consequence of its alleged violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute, Novartis has caused the submission of numerous false claims for drugs to federal health care programs, including Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE and the Department of Veterans Affairs health care program, resulting in millions of dollars in reimbursements. Novartis’s unlawful conduct caused those false claims to be made to and paid by the federal health care programs.  

The lawsuit was originally brought by former Novartis sales representative Oswald Bilotta under the whistleblower provision of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud to sue on behalf of the government and share in the recovery.  The U.S. seeks treble damages and penalties under the False Claims Act as well as damages under the common law.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

U.S. Files Complaint Against Lance Armstrong Re: Fraud on USPS

April 24, 2013

The U.S. government filed its complaint against former cycling champion Lance Armstrong in Washington, D.C., Reuters reported yesterday.  Armstrong, now stripped of his seven Tour de France wins, is accused of defrauding his sponsor, the U.S. Postal Service, by taking millions of dollars in sponsorship money while at the same time engaging in prohibited substance and method use (“doping”).

The complaint alleges that the team, including Armstrong, “knowingly caused material violations of the sponsorship agreements by regularly and systematically employing banned substances and methods to enhance their performance…as a result, the Defendants submitted or caused to be submitted to the United States false or fraudulent invoices for payment.”  The complaint alleges that, “[T]he United States suffered damage in that it did not receive the value of services for which it bargained.”  The U.S. Postal Service paid $40 million to Armstrong and his teammates during their sponsorship.  Armstrong’s salary at that time, excluding bonuses, was $17.9 million.

Last summer, Armstrong ended his fight against years of doping allegations and was stripped of his Tour de France titles as well as his 2000 Olympic medal.  He has also been banned for life from professional cycling.  Earlier this year, Armstrong admitted to doping during a TV interview with Oprah Winfrey.

The allegations were originally made in a suit filed by Armstrong’s ex-teammate, Floyd Landis, under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud to sue on behalf of the government and share in the recovery.  If the government finds merit in the case, it may intervene, which it has done in this case.  Under the False Claims Act, the government may recover up to three times the amount of the loss attributable to fraud.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content