False Claims Act

HPH Hospice Settles Healthcare Fraud Claims for $1M; Whistleblowers to Get $250K

August 14, 2013

Florida-based HPH Hospice agreed to pay $1 million to resolve allegations that the company knowingly submitted or caused the submission of false claims to Medicare and Medicaid, the U.S. Department of Justice announced last month.

The Medicare hospice benefit is available for patients who have a life expectancy of six months or less if their disease runs its normal course.  Patients admitted to a hospice stop receiving care to treat their illnesses and instead receive medical care focused on providing them with relief from the symptoms, pain, and stress of a terminal illness.  Medicare reimburses for different levels of hospice care.

HPH Hospice allegedly submitted false Medicare and Medicaid claims for patients who did not need end of life care.  The government alleged that HPH Hospice caused staff to admit ineligible patients in order to meet targets imposed by management, adopted procedures to delay and discourage staff from discharging patients who were not appropriate for hospice services, instructed staff to make false or misleading statements in patients’ medical records to make them appear eligible when they were not, and failed to implement an adequate compliance program that might have corrected these problems.

The settlement also resolved allegations that HPH Hospice billed the government at higher reimbursement rates than it was entitled to receive and provided illegal kickbacks in the form of free services to skilled nursing facilities in exchange for patient referrals.

HPH Hospice has also agreed to enter into a Corporate Integrity Agreement with the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services that provides for procedures and reviews to be put in place to avoid and detect conduct similar to that which gave rise to the settlement.

The lawsuit was originally filed by Heather Numbers and Greg Davis, former HPH Hospice employees, under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud against the government to sue on behalf of the government and share in the recovery.  Numbers and Davis will collectively receive $250,000 as their share of the settlement.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Park Avenue Medical Associates Settles Medicare Fraud Claims for $1M

August 5, 2013

New York-based Park Avenue Medical Associates, P.C., Park Avenue Health Care Management LLC, and Park Avenue Health Care Management, Inc. (collectively “PAMA”) have agreed to pay $1 million to resolve allegations that the companies knowingly submitted or caused the submission of false claims to Medicare, the U.S. Department of Justice announced last month.

Medicare prohibits payment for services that are not “reasonable and necessary” for the diagnosis or treatment of an illness or injury, as well as payment for any claim without adequate documentation substantiating the reasonableness and necessity of the services provided.  In particular, Medicare does not cover psychotherapy services rendered to patients with Alzheimer’s disease or dementia unless the patient’s dementia is mild, the patient has the capacity to recall what occurred at the therapy from one session to the next, and that capacity is documented in the patient’s record.  Psychotherapy services are not covered when dementia has produced a severe enough cognitive defect to prevent psychotherapy from being effective. In addition, Medicare provides that psychiatric diagnostic examinations are covered only once for each episode of illness or suspected illness in a patient.

In violation of Medicare policies, as well as its own policies, PAMA provided psychotherapy to patients who, because of their severe dementia, lacked the capacity to benefit from it.  In addition, PAMA billed for psychiatric evaluations that were duplicative, failed to comply with Medicare rules, and reflected a lack of coordination of care both among PAMA’s own psychiatrists, psychologists and nurses, and between PAMA’s employees and staff at the facilities at which PAMA performed services.

PAMA also entered into a Corporate Integrity Agreement with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General, in order to ensure future compliance with Medicare laws and regulations.

The lawsuit was originally filed by Zachary Wolfson, a former PAMA employee, under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud against the government to sue on behalf of the government and share in the recovery.  Wolfson’s share of the settlement has yet to be determined.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

U.S. Intervenes in Medicare Fraud Suit Against Fla. Home Health Provider

August 2, 2013

The government will intervene in a whistleblower lawsuit against Florida-based A Plus Home Health Care, Inc. and its owner, Tracy Nemerofsky, the U.S. Department of Justice announced last month.  A Plus allegedly offered referring physicians’ spouses sham marketing positions with the company to induce the physicians to refer Medicare patients for its home health care services.

The government alleges that, beginning in 2006, A Plus engaged in a scheme to increase Medicare referrals by hiring at least seven physicians’ spouses and one physician’s boyfriend to perform marketing duties but required them to perform few, if any, actual job duties.  The spouses’ and boyfriend’s salaries were allegedly an inducement and reward for the physicians’ referrals of Medicare patients to A Plus.  To cover up the scheme, the government alleges, Ms. Nemerofsky generated sham personnel files, which included lists of job duties that the spouses and boyfriend never performed, and performance reviews of tasks the spouses and boyfriend never completed, to give the false impression that the spouses and boyfriend were legitimate employees.

The lawsuit was originally filed by William Guthrie, a former A Plus director of development, under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud against the government to sue on behalf of the government and share in the recovery.  The government may then choose to intervene, as it elected to do in this case.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Judge Boosts UTC’s Penalty to $664M From $473M

July 29, 2013

A federal judge increased United Technologies Corp.’s False Claims Act penalties by 40 percent, to $664.4 million, Reuters reported earlier this month.  Last month, Connecticut-based UTC was found liable for $473 million in damages and penalties arising from a contract with the U.S. Air Force for fighter aircraft engine, the highest recovery ever obtained by the government in a False Claims Act case.

United Technologies allegedly proposed prices for the engine contract that misrepresented how the company calculated those prices.  Specifically, the government alleged that United Technologies failed to include in its price proposal historical discounts that it received from suppliers, and instead knowingly used outdated information that excluded such discounts.  As a result, the government paid hundreds of millions more than it otherwise would have paid for the engines.

The U.S. Department of Justice requested the increase, in order to reflect interest on the $473 million judgment.  Interest rates on the award varied from 6 percent to 8 percent per year, and the interest imposed dated back to 1986.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Shredding Companies Settle Contract Fraud Claims for $1.1M

July 26, 2013

Two of the country’s largest commercial shredding services companies, Shred-It Incorporated and Iron Mountain, recently agreed to pay $1.1 million between them to settle allegations that the companies knowingly submitted or caused the submission of false claims to the federal government, related to contracts for secure shredding services, the U.S. Department of Justice announced this month.

According to the complaint (see below), Iron Mountain and Shred-It obtained government contracts to provide document-shredding services under certain terms, including that documents be shredded to a very secure size not exceeding 1/32 inch in width with a 1/64-inch tolerance by 1/2 inch in length.  (The smaller the shred size, the more secure the shredded document is against unauthorized attempts to reconstruct it.)  However, the defendants allegedly did not even possess equipment that could shred documents to the secure shred size that was agreed to in the contract.  Furthermore, the defendants allegedly obtained additional revenue by reselling the improperly shredded documents to paper recyclers.

The lawsuit was originally filed by Douglas Knisely, the owner and operator of a small, family-owned secure shredding business, under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud against the government to sue on behalf of the government and claim a share in the recovery.  Knisely’s share of the settlement has yet to be determined.

A third defendant, Cintas Corporation, continues to contest the allegations.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

$1.8M Award to be Paid to SAIC Contract Fraud Whistleblower

July 25, 2013

Whistleblower Richard Priem will receive $1.8 million as his share of the Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) settlement with the U.S. government, the Associated Press reported recently.

SAIC received federal grant money through the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology to provide course management, development, and instruction to first responder personnel to prevent and respond to terrorist attacks involving explosive devices.  The government alleged that SAIC’s cost proposals falsely represented that SAIC would use far more expensive personnel to carry out its efforts than it actually did use, resulting in inflated charges to the United States.

The U.S. Department of Justice announced in June that SAIC would settle the allegations for $11.75 million.

According to Priem, a former project manager for SAIC, high-level executives at the company were aware of the billing issues and worried about being caught.

Priem initiated the lawsuit under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act.  Under the False Claims Act, a private citizen with knowledge of fraud against the government can sue on behalf of the government and share in the recovery. 

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Gallup Settles Contract Fraud Claims for $10.5M; Whistleblower to Get $1.9M

July 22, 2013

The polling and market research firm Gallup Organization has agreed to pay $10.5 million to resolve allegations that the company violated the False Claims Act and the Procurement Integrity Act for conduct involving several of its federal government contracts and subcontracts, the U.S. Department of Justice announced this month.  Gallup is headquartered in Washington, D.C.

The government alleged that Gallup knowingly overestimated labor hours in proposals to the U.S. Mint and State Department for contracts that were to be awarded without competition; as a result, the two federal agencies awarded Gallup contracts at inflated prices.  Gallup also allegedly engaged in improper employment negotiations with a then-Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) official, Timothy Cannon, in order to obtain a FEMA subcontract at an inflated price and additional FEMA funding after the subcontract was awarded. 

Separately, in April 2013, Cannon paid the government $40,000 to resolve allegations that he violated the Procurement Integrity Act by improperly negotiating for and accepting an offer of employment from Gallup while being personally and substantially involved in Gallup’s subcontract with FEMA.  In related criminal proceedings, on January 15, 2013, Cannon pled guilty to a federal conflict of interest statute, and was subsequently sentenced to probation. 

The lawsuit was originally filed by Michael Lindley, a former Gallup employee, under the whistleblower provision of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud against the government to sue on behalf of the government and share in the recovery.  Lindley will receive $1.9 million as his share of the settlement.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Jackson Cardio. and Allegiance Health Settle Healthcare Fraud Claims for $4M

July 16, 2013

Michigan-based healthcare practices Jackson Cardiology Associates (JCA) and Allegiance Health have agreed to pay a total of $4 million to settle allegations that the facilities knowingly submitted or caused the submission of false claims to Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal health programs, the U.S. Department of Justice announced this week.

JCA owner Dr. Jashu Patel and his associates allegedly performed medically inappropriate cardiac procedures, including invasive catheterizations at Allegiance Health.  Specifically, the evidence showed that Dr. Patel ordered catheterizations for patients based on findings from nuclear stress tests that he improperly read as positive.  The government found that three-quarters of these patients had no significant heart blockages.  These catheterizations involve snaking a hollow tube into the heart through an incision in the patient’s groin.

Patel and Jackson Cardiology Associates also allegedly performed a variety of other office-based unnecessary tests and procedures, including peripheral stenting. 

Because the unnecessary procedures were paid for by Medicare or Medicaid, these constituted false claims.

The lawsuit was originally filed by Dr. Julie Kovach, a Michigan cardiologist, under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud against the government to sue on behalf of the government and share in the recovery.  Kovach’s share of the settlement has not been announced.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

SAIC Settles Contract Fraud Claims for $5.75M; Whistleblower to Get $977.5K

July 15, 2013

Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) has agreed to pay the U.S. government $5.75 million to settle allegations that the company knowingly submitted or caused the submission of false claims under a contract with the General Services Administration (GSA), the U.S. Department of Justice announced earlier this month.

In 2006, GSA awarded a blanket purchase agreement (BPA) to SAIC for professional engineering and consulting services related to the study and evaluation of new products and emerging technologies.  The government alleged that SAIC personnel provided false information to GSA contracting officials to induce them to award the BPA to SAIC.  In particular, the government alleged that SAIC caused Lt. Colonel Steve Stallings (ret.), allegedly an agent of SAIC, to falsely represent himself as an employee of the Senior Executive Staff of the Department of Defense and the Director of another federal agency.  As a result, SAIC received federal funding it would not otherwise have received, had the company not provided false information to procure the contract.

The lawsuit was originally filed by Richard Ferner, a retired Lt. Colonel in the U.S. Air Force, under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud against the government to sue on behalf of the government and share in the recovery.  Ferner will receive $977,500 as his share of the settlement.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

TranS1 Settles Medicare Fraud Claims for $6M; Whistleblower to Get $1.02M

July 12, 2013

North Carolina-based TranS1 Inc., now known as Baxano Surgical Inc., has agreed to pay the U.S. government $6 million to resolve allegations that the company knowingly submitted or caused the submission of false claims to Medicare and other federal health programs, the U.S. Department of Justice announced last week.

The government alleged that TranS1 knowingly caused health care providers to submit claims with incorrect diagnosis or procedure codes for minimally-invasive spine fusion surgeries using Trans1’s AxiaLIF System, which was developed as an alternative to invasive spine fusion surgeries.  The government alleged that TranS1 improperly counseled physicians and hospitals to bill for the AxiaLIF System by using incorrect and inaccurate codes intended for more invasive spine fusion surgeries, resulting in health care providers receiving greater reimbursement than they were entitled to.  

The government further alleged that TranS1 knowingly paid illegal remuneration to certain physicians for participating in speaker programs and consultant meetings intended to induce them to use TranS1 products, in violation of the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute, and thereby caused false claims to be submitted to federal health care programs.  The Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits offering or paying remuneration to induce referrals of items or services covered by federally-funded programs and is intended to ensure that a physician’s medical judgments are not compromised by improper financial incentives.

In addition, the United States alleged that TranS1 promoted the sale and use of its AxiaLIF System for uses that were not approved or cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, including use in certain procedures to treat complex spine deformity, and were thus not covered by federal health care programs.     

As part of the settlement, TranS1 has agreed to enter into a corporate integrity agreement with the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services.  That agreement provides for procedures and reviews to be put in place to avoid and promptly detect conduct similar to that which gave rise to this matter.  

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content