Chanler Case Archive

Since its inception, The Chanler Group and its clients have tirelessly researched and analyzed consumer products for the presence of detectable levels of heavy metals, phthalates, and other toxins. Over the last two decades, The Chanler Group’s clients, acting as citizen enforcers on behalf of California consumers, have filed hundreds of Proposition 65 notices, and pursued lengthy litigation in an effort to secure reformulation commitments for these  products from their sellers and manufacturers. The Chanler Group’s clients continue to closely monitor these industries to ensure the health and safety of all California residents.

firm casework - enforcement

Format: 2021-09-05
Format: 2021-09-05
January 31, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Tuesday Morning, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 31, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
January 12, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
In the case Brimer v. Universal Screen Arts, Inc.; et al. the Honorable James L. Warren entered a Consent Judgment on January 12, 2006. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendants Universal Screen Arts, Inc., Signals Catalogue Corp., Lillian Vernon Corporation, Casual Living USA, Inc., and RedEnvelope, Inc. (collectively "Defendants...
January 12, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
In the case Brimer v. Wells Manufacturing USA Inc.; et al., the Honorable James L. Warren entered a Consent Judgment on January 12, 2006. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendants Wells Manufacturing USA Inc.; Wells Manufacturing, Inc.; and the May Department Stores Company (collectively "Wells") sold glassware with colored...
January 11, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Coronado Brewing Co. Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 11, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
January 11, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
GatewayCDI, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 11, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
January 11, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
IKEA U.S. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 11, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
January 11, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Kikkoman Foods, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 11, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
January 11, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
VA Software Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 11, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
January 6, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Metropark USA, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 6, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
January 5, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Dennis Foland, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 5, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
January 5, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Springs Industries, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 5, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
January 5, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
TravelCenters of America, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 5, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
December 31, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Save Mart Supermarkets (dba Save Mart and Food Maxx) elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 31, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to...
December 29, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Bay Meadows Operating Co., LLC and Bay Meadows Racing Association (collectively “Bay Meadows”) elected to address their Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 29, 2005.  In doing so, Bay Meadows became...
December 29, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Kane Industries Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 29, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...