Chanler Case Archive

Since its inception, The Chanler Group and its clients have tirelessly researched and analyzed consumer products for the presence of detectable levels of heavy metals, phthalates, and other toxins. Over the last two decades, The Chanler Group’s clients, acting as citizen enforcers on behalf of California consumers, have filed hundreds of Proposition 65 notices, and pursued lengthy litigation in an effort to secure reformulation commitments for these  products from their sellers and manufacturers. The Chanler Group’s clients continue to closely monitor these industries to ensure the health and safety of all California residents.

firm casework - enforcement

Format: 2019-07-17
Format: 2019-07-17
November 22, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
notNeutral, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 22, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
November 21, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Allied IMEX, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
November 21, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Ande Rooney, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
November 21, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Crystal Clear Industries elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
November 21, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Deere & Company elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
November 21, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Highland Graphics, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
November 21, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Leanin’ Tree Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
November 21, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Royal Products, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
November 21, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Smith-Western Co. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
November 18, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Blyth, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 18, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
November 18, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Broguiere’s Farm Fresh Dairy, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 18, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate...
November 18, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
C & D Visionary, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 18, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
November 18, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Darice, Inc. and its corporate affiliate Lamrite West, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 18, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to...
November 18, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Image West Apparel, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 18, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
November 18, 2005
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
M. Cornell Importers, Inc elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 18, 2005.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...