Chanler Case Archive

Since its inception, The Chanler Group and its clients have tirelessly researched and analyzed consumer products for the presence of detectable levels of heavy metals, phthalates, and other toxins. Over the last two decades, The Chanler Group’s clients, acting as citizen enforcers on behalf of California consumers, have filed hundreds of Proposition 65 notices, and pursued lengthy litigation in an effort to secure reformulation commitments for these  products from their sellers and manufacturers. The Chanler Group’s clients continue to closely monitor these industries to ensure the health and safety of all California residents.

firm casework - enforcement

Format: 2019-07-18
Format: 2019-07-18
February 10, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
In the case Brimer v. Starbucks Corporation, the Marin County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on February 10, 2006. In this enforcement matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendant Starbucks Corporation ("Starbucks") sold ceramic mugs and other glassware products with colored artwork on the exterior surface that contain the heavy...
February 8, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Corporate Express, Inc. and Corporate Express Promotional Products, Inc. (collectively "Corporate Express") elected to address their Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 8, 2006. In doing so, Corporate...
February 8, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Tequilera Cabo Wabo, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 8, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
February 7, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
American Gift Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 7, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
February 7, 2006
Lead
Consent Judgment
On February 7, 2006, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Westrim, Inc.; Westrim Crafts; Westrim Trimming Corporation, Michaels Stores, Inc. This enforcement action resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendants Westrim, Inc., Westrim Crafts, and Westrim Trimming Corporation, (collectively "Westrim...
February 6, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Bennington Potters, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
February 6, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Dakota Brothers, Inc. d/b/a Marina Food (Cupertino) elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually...
February 6, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Goldstar Supermarket elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
February 6, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Grocery Outlet Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
February 6, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Home Box Office, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
February 6, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Jumpin’ Banana LLC elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
February 6, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Lunardi’s Super Market, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the...
February 6, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Nancy Sales Company, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
February 6, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Nelly’s Market, Inc., d.b.a. Old Town Liquor & Deli elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to...
February 6, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Oneida Ltd. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...