Chanler Case Archive

Since its inception, The Chanler Group and its clients have tirelessly researched and analyzed consumer products for the presence of detectable levels of heavy metals, phthalates, and other toxins. Over the last two decades, The Chanler Group’s clients, acting as citizen enforcers on behalf of California consumers, have filed hundreds of Proposition 65 notices, and pursued lengthy litigation in an effort to secure reformulation commitments for these  products from their sellers and manufacturers. The Chanler Group’s clients continue to closely monitor these industries to ensure the health and safety of all California residents.

firm casework - enforcement

Format: 2019-07-18
Format: 2019-07-18
June 19, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Marck & Associates, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 19, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
June 19, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Pallios Bros. Inc. d/b/a Richland Markets elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 19, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate...
June 16, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Wine Things Unlimited Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 16, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
June 5, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Heineken USA, Incorporated elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 5, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
May 5, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Diamond Hong, Inc. and WFL, Inc. (collectively “Diamond Hong”) elected to address their Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on May 5, 2006.  In doing so, Diamond Hong became a member of a class of settling...
May 5, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Doosan Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on May 5, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
May 5, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Lab Safety Supply, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on May 5, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
May 5, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Regent Alliance, Inc., Lynns Concepts, Inc. and Lynns Concepts, Ltd. (collectively “Regent Alliance”) elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on May 5, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member...
May 5, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Michaels Stores, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on May 5, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
May 5, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
D1
Skyy Spirits LLC elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on May 5, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
May 1, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
The Honorable Ronald E. Quidachay of the San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on May 1, 2006, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant McIlhenny Company ("McIlhenny") sold mugs and other glass and ceramic tableware with colored artwork on the exterior surface containing the heavy metal lead and/or...
April 21, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Summerwood Winery & Inn, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 21, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the...
April 21, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Tablas Creek Vineyard elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 21, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
April 19, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
The Santa Clara Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on April 19, 2006, in Brimer v. Dave & Busters, Inc.; et al. In this matter, whistleblower Russell Brimer alleged that Dave & Busters, Inc. ("Dave and Busters") sold shot glasses and other glassware and ceramicware intended to hold food and/or beverages with colored artwork that contain the heavy...
April 12, 2006
Cadmium, Lead
Consent Judgment
Behn of North America elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006.  In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...