Consent Judgment
June 19, 2017
The parties involved in the case Leeman v. Numi, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on June 19, 2017. In this matter, citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D. alleged that Numi, Inc. (“Numi”) sold dried teas containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.
As part of the agreement, Numi...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, Dried Teas, Lead, Numi, Inc., Proposition 65, Reformulation, Warnings, Whistleblower, Whitney R. Leeman
June 15, 2017
The parties involved in the case Englander v. Staedtler-Mars Limited executed a Consent Judgment on June 15, 2017. In this matter, citizen enforcer Peter Englander alleged that Staedtler-Mars Limited (“Staedtler”) sold vinyl/PVC cutting mats containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) and diisononyl phthalate (“DINP...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Cancer, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, DEHP, DINP, Peter Englander, Phthalates, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Staedtler-Mars Limited, Vinyl/PVC Cutting Mats, Warnings, Whistleblower
May 26, 2017
The parties involved in the case Moore v. E.T. Browne Drug Co., Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on May 26, 2017. In this matter, citizen enforcer John Moore alleged that E.T. Browne Drug Co., Inc. (“E.T. Browne”) sold sunscreen containing the chemical benzophenone in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.
As...
Benzophenone, Cancer, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, E.T. Browne Drug Co., Inc., John Moore, Proposition 65, Reformulation, sunscreen, Whistleblower
June 1, 2017
The parties involved in the case Brimer v. Tuesday Morning Corporation, et al. executed a Consent Judgment on June 1, 2017. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that Tuesday Morning Corporation and Tuesday Morning, Inc. (collectively, “Tuesday Morning”) sold vinyl/PVC earphone cords containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, DEHP, Phthalates, Reformulation, Russell Brimer, Tuesday Morning Corporation, Tuesday Morning, Inc., Vinyl/PVC Earphone Cords
May 19, 2017
The parties involved in the case Moore v. Weaver Leather, LLC executed a Consent Judgment on May 19, 2017. In this matter, citizen enforcer John Moore alleged that Weaver Leather, LLC (“Weaver Leather”) sold exhibitor harnesses with vinyl/PVC components containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, DEHP, Exhibitor Harnesses with Vinyl/PVC Components, John Moore, Phthalates, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Weaver Leather, LLC, Whistleblower
May 22, 2017
The parties involved in the case Englander v. ASA Electronics LLC executed a Consent Judgment on May 22, 2017. In this matter, citizen enforcer Peter Englander alleged that ASA Electronics LLC (“ASA”) sold headphones with vinyl/PVC headbands and ear cushions containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of...
ASA Electronics LLC, Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, DEHP, headphones with vinyl/PVC headbands and ear cushions, Peter Englander, Phthalates, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Whistleblower
May 22, 2017
The parties involved in the case Leeman v. Upton Tea Imports, LLC executed a Consent Judgment on May 22, 2017. In this matter, citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D. alleged that Upton Tea Imports, LLC (“Upton”) sold dried teas containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.
As part...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, Dried Teas, Lead, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Upton Tea Imports, LLC, Warnings, Whistleblower, Whitney R. Leeman
December 1, 2015
The parties involved in the case Wozniak v. Tabletops Unlimited, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on December 2, 2015. In this matter, citizen enforcer Paul Wozniak alleged that Tabletops Unlimited, Inc. (“Tabletops”) sold nylon cooking utensils containing the chemical 4,4’-Methylenedianiline ("4,4'-MDA") in the State of California without...
4,4’-MDA, Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, Nylon Cooking Utensils, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Tabletops Unlimited, Inc., Whistleblower
December 8, 2015
The parties involved in the case Wozniak v. Raley’s and H.E. Butt Grocery Company executed a Consent Judgment on December 8, 2015. In this matter, citizen enforcer Paul Wozniak alleged that Raley’s and H.E. Butt Grocery Company (“H.E. Butt”) sold nylon cooking utensils containing the chemical 4,4’-methylenedianiline (“4,4’-MDA...
4,4’-MDA, Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, John Moore, Nylon Cooking Utensils, Proposition 65, Raley’s and H.E. Butt Grocery Company, Reformulation, Whistleblower
November 17, 2015
The parties involved in the case Moore v. Pull’R Holding Company executed a Consent Judgment on November 17, 2015. In this matter, citizen enforcer John Moore alleged that Pull’R Holding Company (“Pull’R”) sold tools with vinyl/PVC grips containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, DEHP, Moorberg, Phthalates, Proposition 65, Pull’R Holding Company, Reformulation, Tools with Vinyl/PVC Grips, Warnings, Whistleblower
Search Our Site
Subscribe to Our Blogs
Sign up for our newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest important news from The Chanler Group
Contact Our Team
Use our online contact form, or visit our offices page for more details on how to reach us.
Want to apply for a grant? Check out our Grant Seeker FAQ.
If you want to contact a whistleblower attorney, please take a look at our Whistleblower Questionnaire.