Consent Judgment
March 29, 2018
The parties involved in the case Leeman v. Starbucks Corporation, et al. executed a Consent Judgment on March 29, 2018. In this matter, citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D. alleged that Teance Fine Teas (“Teance”) sold dried teas containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings. ...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, Dried Teas, Lead, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Teance Fine Teas, Warnings, Whistleblower, Whitney R. Leeman
March 28, 2018
The parties involved in the case Wozniak v. Thexton Manufacturing Company executed a Consent Judgment on March 28, 2018. In this matter, citizen enforcer Paul Wozniak alleged that Thexton Manufacturing Company (“Thexton”) sold circuit testers with vinyl/PVC cords and clamp handle grips containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Circuit Testers with Vinyl/PVC Cords and Clamp Handle Grips, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, DEHP, Paul Wozniak, Phthalates, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Thexton Manufacturing Company, Warnings, Whistleblower
March 29, 2018
The parties involved in the case Held v. Grote Industries, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on March 29, 2018. In this matter, citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E. alleged that Grote Industries, Inc. (“Grote”) sold vinyl/PVC electrical wires containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California...
Anthony E. Held, Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, DEHP, Grote Industries, Inc., Phthalates, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Vinyl/PVC Electrical Wires, Warnings, Whistleblower
March 19, 2018
The parties involved in the case Englander v. Smith Ventures, Ltd., et al. executed a Consent Judgment on March 19, 2018. In this matter, citizen enforcer Peter Englander alleged that Smith Ventures, Ltd. (“Smith Ventures”) sold vinyl/PVC exercise balls containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, DEHP, Peter Englander, Phthalates, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Smith Ventures, Ltd., Vinyl/PVC Exercise Balls, Warnings, Whistleblower
March 16, 2018
The parties involved in the case Englander v. Woolrich, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on March 16, 2018. In this matter, citizen enforcer Peter Englander alleged that Woolrich, Inc. (“Woolrich”) sold glasses with exterior designs containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings. ...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, Glasses with Exterior Designs, Lead, Peter Englander, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Warnings, Whistleblower, Woolrich, Inc.
November 15, 2017
The parties involved in the case Wozniak v. W.C. Bradley/Zebco Holdings, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on November 15, 2017. In this matter, citizen enforcer Paul Wozniak alleged that W.C. Bradley/Zebco Holdings, Inc. (“Zebco”) sold vinyl/PVC zipper pulls containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, DEHP, Paul Wozniak, Phthalates, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Vinyl/PVC Zipper Pulls, W.C. Bradley/Zebco Holdings, Inc., Warnings, Whistleblower
February 23, 2018
The parties involved in the case Vinocur v. Neet Products, Inc., et al. executed a Consent Judgment on February 23, 2018. In this matter, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur alleged that Neet Products, Inc. (“Neet”) sold vinyl/PVC quivers containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, DEHP, Laurence Vinocur, Neet Products, Inc., Phthalates, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Vinyl/PVC Quivers, Warnings, Whistleblower
February 2, 2018
The parties involved in the case Leeman v. R.C. Bigelow, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on February 2, 2018. In this matter, citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D. alleged that R.C. Bigelow, Inc. (“R.C. Bigelow”) sold dried teas containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings. ...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, Dried Teas, Lead, Proposition 65, R.C. Bigelow, Inc., Reformulation, Warnings, Whistleblower, Whitney R. Leeman
February 3, 2018
The parties involved in the case Leeman v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on February 3, 2018. In this matter, citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D. alleged that Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (“Hain Celestial”) sold dried teas containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, Dried Teas, Hain Celestial Group, Inc., Lead, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Warnings, Whistleblower, Whitney R. Leeman
January 25, 2018
The parties involved in the case Moore v. Nady Systems, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on January 25, 2018. In this matter, citizen enforcer John Moore alleged that Nady Systems, Inc. (“Nady”) sold vinyl/PVC microphone pouches and vinyl/PVC microphone cords containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, DEHP, John Moore, Nady Computers, Inc., Phthalates, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Warnings, Whistleblower
Search Our Site
Subscribe to Our Blogs
Sign up for our newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest important news from The Chanler Group
Contact Our Team
Use our online contact form, or visit our offices page for more details on how to reach us.
Want to apply for a grant? Check out our Grant Seeker FAQ.
If you want to contact a whistleblower attorney, please take a look at our Whistleblower Questionnaire.