Proposition 65 Warning

Leeman v. Excel Hobby Blades Corp.

Date: 
October 8, 2014

On October 8, 2014, the parties involved in the matter between whistleblower Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D., and settling party Excel Hobby Blades Corp. (“Excel”) executed an out-of-court Settlement Agreement.  In this case, Leeman alleged that Excel sold tools with vinyl/PVC grips containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Plaintiff: 
Whitney Leeman, Ph.D.
Defendant: 
Excel Hobby Blades Corp.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement Agreement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Nishimoto Trading Co., Ltd.

Date: 
October 10, 2014
Industry Categories: 

Citizen enforcer Anthony Held, Ph.D., P.E. and settling party Nishimoto Trading Co., Ltd. (“Nishimoto”) entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement on October 10, 2014, which resolved Held’s allegations that Nishimoto sold dried seaweed containing arsenic in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Anthony Held, Ph.D., P.E.
Defendant: 
Nishimoto Trading Co., Ltd.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement Agreement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Standard Fusee Corporation

Date: 
September 4, 2014

Whistleblower Anthony Held, Ph.D., P.E. and settling party Standard Fusee Corporation (“Standard Fusee”) entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement on September 4, 2014, which resolved Held’s allegations that Standard Fusee sold flashlights with vinyl/PVC handles containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Plaintiff: 
Anthony Held, Ph.D., P.E.
Defendant: 
Standard Fusee Corporation
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement Agreement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held Files Complaint Against Johnson & Johnson and Rite Aid Re: Sunscreen

October 10, 2014
Image: 

Our client Anthony Held, Ph.D, P.E., has filed a complaint against 11 defendants alleging the sale of sunscreen containing the chemical benzophenone without the requisite Proposition 65 warning.  Benzophenone is a chemical known to the State of California to cause cancer, and companies offering products for sale in California that contain benzophenone must provide consumers with a “clear and reasonable” health hazard warning.  The alleged violators include Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Rite Aid, Walgreen, and Wal-Mart.

Held seeks civil penalties, an injunction to prevent the companies from manufacturing, distributing, or offering the products for sale or use in California without Proposition 65 warnings, and such other and further relief as the court deems just and proper.

The Chanler Group represents citizen enforcers who, acting in the public interest, commence actions against businesses offering products for sale in California that contain chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm without first providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65. Citizen enforcers bringing Proposition 65 actions in the public interest may obtain a Court Judgment imposing civil penalties, an injunction requiring reformulation of products, and/or provision of health hazard warnings. The Chanler Group has represented citizen enforcers of Proposition 65 for more than twenty years.

Cross-Post On: 
Both

Brimer v. Anest Iwata-Medea, Inc.

Date: 
October 6, 2014

Citizen enforcer Russell Brimer’s allegations against defendant Anest Iwata-Medea, Inc. (“Anest”) were resolved on October 6, 2014, when the parties executed a Consent Judgment.  In this matter, Brimer alleged that Anest sold metal hose nozzle fittings containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Russell Brimer
Defendant: 
Anest Iwata-Medea, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$40,000-$49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Wozniak Settles With Hancock Fabrics Re: Lead and DEHP

October 8, 2014
Image: 

Citizen enforcer Paul Wozniak has entered into a settlement agreement with Hancock Fabrics in regards to allegations that Hancock sold jars with exterior decorations containing the heavy metal lead and storage baskets containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) without the requisite health hazard warnings.  Lead and DEHP are known to the State of California to cause cancer and/or birth defects and reproductive harm, and companies offering products for sale that contain such chemicals are required by Proposition 65 to provide consumers with a “clear and reasonable” health hazard warning.

In addition to paying $16,000 in civil penalties, 75 percent of which go to the State of California to further public health and the environment, Hancock has agreed to sell only reformulated products in California that are virtually free of lead and DEHP.  Should Hancock provide written certification by November 1, 2014 that all jars and baskets in California are reformulated, Wozniak agreed to waive a portion of the fine.

For more details, see the case summary on our website: Wozniak v. Hancock Fabrics, Inc.

The Chanler Group represents citizen enforcers who, acting in the public interest, commence actions against businesses offering products for sale in California that contain chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm without first providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65. Citizen enforcers bringing Proposition 65 actions in the public interest may obtain a Court Judgment imposing civil penalties, an injunction requiring reformulation of products, and/or provision of health hazard warnings. The Chanler Group has represented citizen enforcers of Proposition 65 for more than twenty years.

Cross-Post On: 
Both

Leeman v. YMF Carpets, Inc.

Date: 
October 6, 2014

The parties involved in the enforcement action Leeman v. YMF Carpets, Inc., et al. executed an agreement on October 6, 2014.  In this matter, citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D., alleged that the defendant YMF Carpets, Inc. (“YMF”) sold ottomans made with vinyl/PVC upholstery containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings. 

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Whitney Leeman, Ph.D.
Defendant: 
YMF Carpets, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Leeman v. Dean Distributors, Inc.

Date: 
October 3, 2014
Industry Categories: 

In the enforcement action Leeman v. Dean Distributors, Inc., whistleblower Whitney Leeman, Ph.D., executed an agreement on October 3, 2014.  In this matter, Leeman alleged that defendant Dean Distributors, Inc. (“Dean”) sold food extracts, flavors, and/or colorings containing 4-methylimidazole ("4-MEI") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings. 

Plaintiff: 
Whitney Leeman, Ph.D.
Defendant: 
Dean Distributors, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Jimco Lamp & Manufacturing Company

Date: 
September 29, 2014

The parties involved in the case Held v. Jimco Lamp & Manufacturing Company, et al. executed a Consent Judgment on September 29, 2014.  In this matter, citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E., alleged that Jimco Lamp & Manufacturing Company (“Jimco”) sold lamps with vinyl/PVC components containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.  

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Anthony Held, Ph.D., P.E.
Defendant: 
Jimco Lamp & Manufacturing Company
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$40,000-$49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held Files Complaint Versus Avery Dennison Re: Lead in Journals

October 6, 2014
Image: 

Client Anthony Held, Ph.D, P.E., has filed a complaint against Avery Dennison Corporation alleging that the company has been selling journals in California that contain lead, without the requisite health hazard warning.  Lead is a chemical known to the State of California to cause cancer and reproductive harm, and companies offering products for sale that contain such chemicals must, under Proposition 65 law, provide consumers with a “clear and reasonable” health hazard warning.  Avery Dennison is a global manufacturer and distributor of office supplies.

Held seeks civil penalties, an injunction to prevent Avery Dennison from selling its products without a Proposition 65 warning, and such other and further relief as the court deems just and proper.

The Chanler Group represents citizen enforcers who, acting in the public interest, commence actions against businesses offering products for sale in California that contain chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm without first providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65. Citizen enforcers bringing Proposition 65 actions in the public interest may obtain a Court Judgment imposing civil penalties, an injunction requiring reformulation of products, and/or provision of health hazard warnings. The Chanler Group has represented citizen enforcers of Proposition 65 for more than twenty years.

Cross-Post On: 
Both
Syndicate content