Proposition 65 Warning

Brimer Issues 7 New 60-Day Notices

June 30, 2016
Image: 

Russell Brimer has issued seven new 60-Day Notices of Violation of Proposition 65 to companies offering products such as napkin rings, cables, and tubing in California that contain chemicals known to the State to cause cancer and/or reproductive harm without the requisite health hazard warning.  Brimer alleges that the companies’ products contain the phthalate chemical DEHP, which is known to the State of California to cause birth defects and other reproductive harm.  Noticed companies include CAP Barbell, Glenoit, and MicroMatic.

See below for a list of Notices.

 

Product Chemical Alleged Violator Citizen Enforcer
Vinyl/PVC Spring Collar Grips DEHP CAP Barbell, Inc. Russell Brimer
Vinyl/PVC Coated Cables DEHP Dundas Jafine Inc. Russell Brimer
Vinyl/PVC Napkin Rings DEHP Glenoit LLC Russell Brimer
Vinyl/PVC Hoses DEHP Leslie’s Holdings, Inc.; Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc. Russell Brimer
Vinyl/PVC Tubing DEHP Micro Matic USA, Inc. Russell Brimer
Tool Grips; Vinyl/PVC Hoses DEHP Northern Brewer, LLC Russell Brimer
Vinyl/PVC Tubing DEHP Pro-Mark, Inc. Russell Brimer

 

See our most recent 60-Day Notices

Cross-Post On: 
Both

Held Settles with Estée Lauder Re: Sunscreen

June 24, 2016
Image: 

Dr. Anthony Held has reached a settlement with The Estée Lauder Companies in regards to alleged violations of Proposition 65.  Held alleged that Estée Lauder sold products with a Sun Protector Factor (“SPF) that contained the chemical benzophenone, which is known to the State of California to cause cancer, without the requisite health hazard warning.

In addition to paying civil penalties, Estée Lauder has agreed to reformulate its products to be virtually free of benzophenone and provide its vendors with the reformulation standards.

For more details and to read the settlement itself, please see the case summary on our website: Held v. The Estée Lauder Companies

The Chanler Group represents citizen enforcers who, acting in the public interest, commence actions against businesses offering products for sale in California that contain chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm without first providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65. Citizen enforcers bringing Proposition 65 actions in the public interest may obtain a Court Judgment imposing civil penalties, an injunction requiring reformulation of products, and/or provision of health hazard warnings.

Cross-Post On: 
Both

Far East Brokers Recalls Children’s Chairs and Swings Due to Lead Paint

June 9, 2016
Image: 

Far East Brokers has initiated a recall of its children’s chairs and swings because the screen-printing on the exterior fabric contains lead in excess of the federal standard.  The chairs and swings have metal frames and pink polyester fabric on which are large red butterfly images and other colorful designs.  The chairs and swings were sold at Weis Markets, wholesale distributors, grocery stores, and drug stores nationwide from January 2016 through April 2016 for between $10 and $50. 

Consumers are urged to immediately stop using the recalled chairs and swings, take them away from children, and return them to their place of purchase for a full refund.  About 6,000 units were sold.

Lead is a chemical known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, and other reproductive harm.  Companies offering products for sale that contain lead must provide consumers with a health hazard warning under Proposition 65 law.

The Chanler Group represents citizen enforcers who, acting in the public interest, commence actions against businesses offering products for sale in California that contain chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm without first providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65. Citizen enforcers bringing Proposition 65 actions in the public interest may obtain a Court Judgment imposing civil penalties, an injunction requiring reformulation of products, and/or provision of health hazard warnings.

Cross-Post On: 
Both

Moore Settles with Novelty Re: Earphone Cords Containing DEHP

June 7, 2016
Image: 

John Moore has negotiated a settlement with Novelty, Inc. in regards to allegations that Novelty sold earphones with cords that contained the phthalate chemical DEHP without the requisite health hazard warning.  DEHP is known to the State of California to cause birth defects and/or other reproductive harm, and California requires companies offering products for sale that contain DEHP to provide consumers with a “clear and reasonable” warning of the risk of exposure.

In addition to paying civil penalties, Novelty has agreed to sell only earphones that have been reformulated to be free of DEHP.

For more details and to read the settlement itself, please see the case summary on our website: Moore v. Novelty, Inc.

The Chanler Group represents citizen enforcers who, acting in the public interest, commence actions against businesses offering products for sale in California that contain chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm without first providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65. Citizen enforcers bringing Proposition 65 actions in the public interest may obtain a Court Judgment imposing civil penalties, an injunction requiring reformulation of products, and/or provision of health hazard warnings.

Cross-Post On: 
Both

Leeman Settles with Paradies Gifts Re: Ponchos

May 18, 2016
Image: 

Dr. Whitney R. Leeman has reached a settlement with Paradies Gifts regarding alleged violations of Proposition 65.  Leeman alleged that Paradies Gifts sold vinyl/PVC ponchos that contained the phthalate chemical DEHP without the requisite health hazard warning.  DEHP is known to the State of California to cause birth defects and other reproductive harm, and companies offering products for sale that contain DEHP are required to provide consumers with a "clear and reasonable" warning of the risk of exposure.

In addition to paying civil penalties, Paradies Gifts has agreed to sell in California only ponchos that have been reformulated to be virtually free of DEHP, or else provide consumers with a Proposition 65 warning.  Should Paradies Gifts provide Leeman with certification by March 15, 2017 that all ponchos sold in California are reformulated, Leeman has agreed to waive a portion of the civil penalty.

For more details and to read the settlement itself, please see the case summary on our website: Leeman v. Paradies Gifts, Inc., et al.

The Chanler Group represents citizen enforcers who, acting in the public interest, commence actions against businesses offering products for sale in California that contain chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm without first providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65. Citizen enforcers bringing Proposition 65 actions in the public interest may obtain a Court Judgment imposing civil penalties, an injunction requiring reformulation of products, and/or provision of health hazard warnings.

Cross-Post On: 
Both

Held Settles with Two Sunscreen Companies

May 6, 2016
Image: 

Our client Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E. has settled with Shiseido Americas Corporation and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. regarding alleged violations of Proposition 65.  Dr. Held alleged that Shiseido and Johnson & Johnson sold SPF products (such as sunscreen, lip balm, lotions containing sunscreen, etc.) that contained the chemical benzophenone, which is known to the State of California to cause cancer, without the requisite health hazard warning.

In addition to paying civil penalties, Shiseido and Johnson & Johnson have agreed to reformulate their products to virtually eliminate benzophenone.  As an incentive to Shiseido and Johnson & Johnson to accelerate reformulation, Dr. Held has agreed to waive a portion of the civil fine should the companies provide him with certification of such by June 15, 2018.

For more details and to read the settlements, please see the case summaries on our website: Held v. Shiseido Americas Corporation and Held v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.

The Chanler Group represents citizen enforcers who, acting in the public interest, commence actions against businesses offering products for sale in California that contain chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm without first providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65. Citizen enforcers bringing Proposition 65 actions in the public interest may obtain a Court Judgment imposing civil penalties, an injunction requiring reformulation of products, and/or provision of health hazard warnings.

Cross-Post On: 
Both

Brimer Files Complaint Against FAM Re: DEHP in Exercise Balls

April 26, 2016
Image: 

Russell Brimer has filed a complaint against FAM, LLC, alleging that FAM violated Proposition 65 by selling exercise balls containing the phthalate chemical DEHP without the requisite health hazard warning.  DEHP is known to the State of California to cause birth defects and other reproductive harm, and Proposition 65 requires companies offering products for sale that contain DEHP to provide consumers with a "clear and reasonable" warning of the risk of exposure.

In addition to civil penalties, Brimer seeks an injunction to prohibit FAM from selling exercise balls that contain DEHP in California unless they have been reformulated to be DEHP-free.

The Chanler Group represents citizen enforcers who, acting in the public interest, commence actions against businesses offering products for sale in California that contain chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm without first providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65. Citizen enforcers bringing Proposition 65 actions in the public interest may obtain a Court Judgment imposing civil penalties, an injunction requiring reformulation of products, and/or provision of health hazard warnings.

Cross-Post On: 
Both

Wozniak Settles with Harold Import Company

April 12, 2016
Image: 

Paul Wozniak has negotiated a settlement with Harold Import Company, resolving allegations that Harold sold nylon cooking utensils containing the chemical 4,4'-MDA without the requisite health hazard warning.  4,4'-MDA is a chemical known to the State of California to cause cancer, and under Proposition 65 law, companies offering products for sale that contain 4,4'-MDA must provide consumers with a "clear and reasonable" warning of the risk of exposure.

In addition to paying civil penalties, Harold has agreed to sell only nylon cooking utensils that have been reformulated to be free of 4,4'-MDA.

For more details and to read the settlement itself, please see the case summary on our website: Wozniak v. Harold Import Co., Inc.

The Chanler Group represents citizen enforcers who, acting in the public interest, commence actions against businesses offering products for sale in California that contain chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm without first providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65. Citizen enforcers bringing Proposition 65 actions in the public interest may obtain a Court Judgment imposing civil penalties, an injunction requiring reformulation of products, and/or provision of health hazard warnings.

Cross-Post On: 
Both

Leeman Files Complaint Against Frankford Candy

April 6, 2016
Image: 

Dr. Whitney R. Leeman has filed a complaint in San Francisco County Superior Court against Frankford Candy LLC, alleging that Frankford Candy violated Proposition 65 by selling mugs with exterior designs containing the heavy metal lead without a health hazard warning to consumers.  Proposition 65 requires that companies offering products for sale in California that contain lead, a chemical known to the State to cause cancer, birth defects, and reproductive harm, must provide consumers with a warning of the risks of exposure.

In addition to civil penalties, Dr. Leeman seeks an injunction prohibiting Frankford Candy from selling mugs with exterior decorations in California without a Proposition 65 warning.

The Chanler Group represents citizen enforcers who, acting in the public interest, commence actions against businesses offering products for sale in California that contain chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm without first providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65. Citizen enforcers bringing Proposition 65 actions in the public interest may obtain a Court Judgment imposing civil penalties, an injunction requiring reformulation of products, and/or provision of health hazard warnings.

Cross-Post On: 
Both

Held Issues Notices to Dozens of Sunscreen Manufacturers and Retailers

March 29, 2016
Image: 

Dr. Anthony Held has issued dozens of 60-Day Notices of Proposition 65 Violation to sunscreen manufacturers and retailers, alleging that they offered octocrylene-containing sunscreens to consumers in California without the requisite health hazard warning.  Octocrylene contains benzophenone, which is a chemical known to the State of California to cause cancer.

 

Cross-Post On: 
Both
Syndicate content