The Chanler Group

Englander v. The Coleman Company, Inc., et al.

The Honorable Peter H. Kirwan of the Santa Clara County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on January 9, 2013, in Englander v. The Coleman Company, Inc., et al. This enforcement action resolved citizen enforcer Peter Englander's allegations that the defendant The Coleman Company, Inc. ("Coleman") sold air mattresses containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Englander
Defendant: 
The Coleman Company, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$80,000-$89,999
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. CM International, Inc.; CMC Worldwide, Inc.

Date: 
January 30, 2013

The Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Moore v. CM International, Inc.; CMC Worldwide, Inc., on January 30, 2013, which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore's allegations that the defendant CMC Worldwide, Inc. ("CMC") sold children's furniture containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
CMC Worldwide, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$60,000-$69,999
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Englander v. CAS Enterprises, Inc.

Date: 
February 14, 2013

An agreement was negotiated on February 14, 2013, when citizen enforcer Peter Englander and settling defendant CAS Enterprises, Inc. ("CAS") entered into a Settlement Agreement which resolved Englander's allegations that CAS sold hand tool grips containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Plaintiff: 
Englander
Defendant: 
CAS Enterprises, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$40,000-$49,999
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Arlee Home Fashions, Inc.

Date: 
January 8, 2013

Citizen enforcer John Moore and settling defendant Arlee Home Fashions, Inc. ("Arlee") entered into a Settlement Agreement on January 8, 2013, which resolved Moore's allegations that Arlee sold vinyl/PVC curtains containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Arlee Home Fashions, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Englander v. American Textile Company, Inc.

Date: 
January 25, 2013

The Settlement Agreement between citizen enforcer Peter Englander and settling party American Textile Company, Inc. ("American Textile") was entered into on January 25, 2013. This agreement resolved Englander's allegations that American Textile sold mattress covers and pillow covers containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Englander
Defendant: 
American Textile Company, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings, Cy Pres
Monetary: 
$130,000-$139,999
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. American Tombow, Inc., et al.

Date: 
January 29, 2013

Citizen enforcer Russell Brimer’s allegations against the defendant American Tombow, Inc. (“Tombow”) were resolved on January 29, 2013, when the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. American Tombow, Inc., et al.  In this enforcement action, Brimer alleged that Tombow sold vinyl/PVC pen pouches containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings. 

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
American Tombow, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$50,000-$59,999
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. 26 International, Inc.

Date: 
February 7, 2013
Industry Categories: 

In Brimer v. 26 International, Inc., the Sacramento County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on February 7, 2013, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant 26 International, Inc. ("26 International") sold belts containing the heavy metal lead within the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
26 International, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000 - $39,999
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

False Claims Act Is Taxpayers' Best Tool to Recoup Funds Lost Through Fraud on Govt

January 31, 2012

The U.S. Department of Justice celebrated the 25th anniversary of the 1986 amendments to the False Claims Act today.  The False Claims Act has been called the single most important tool that American taxpayers have to recover funds when false claims are made to the federal government, including health care fraud, mortgage fraud, and procurement fraud.     

“In the last quarter century, the False Claims Act’s success has been unparalleled with more than $30 billion dollars recovered since it was amended in 1986 and $8.8 billion since January 2009,” said Attorney General Eric Holder.  “In these challenging economic times when resources are scarce, government budgets are being tightened and so many Americans are forced to do more with less, the need to act as sound stewards of every taxpayer dollar has never been more clear or more urgent.  The Department of Justice has achieved record recoveries in recent years and we will continue to aggressively pursue those who would take advantage of their fellow citizens.”

The False Claims Act was originally passed by Congress during the administration of President Abraham Lincoln in 1863 to help the government recover federal funds stolen through fraud by U.S. government contractors.   During the Civil War, the law was used to recover monies from unscrupulous contractors who sold the Union Army decrepit horses and mules in ill health, faulty rifles and ammunition, and rancid rations and provisions.

In 1986, Congress amended the False Claims Act to permit the government to seek treble damages and revised the statute’s qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions to increase the incentives for whistleblowers to come forward with allegations of fraud.   Since those changes were enacted, the Justice Department has recovered more than $30 billion under the act.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Nursing Home Manager to Pay $2.7M for Medicare Fraud, $405K to Whistleblower

March 12, 2013

Tennessee-based Grace Healthcare LLC and its affiliate Grace Ancillary Services LLC (collectively, Grace) have agreed to pay $2.7 million to settle allegations that they knowingly submitted false claims to the Medicare and TennCare/Medicaid programs for unnecessary rehabilitation therapy, the Department of Justice announced last week.

The suit alleged that from 2007 to 2011, Grace pressured therapists in ten of its nursing homes to meet targets for Medicare revenue regardless of patients' individual therapy needs.  This resulted in patients being billed for large amounts of unnecessary rehabilitation and therapy, which were then paid for by Medicare.  As part of the settlement, Grace has agreed to procedures and reviews to be put in place in order to prevent future similar conduct.

The suit was originally filed by an unnamed former Grace employee under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens to bring suit on behalf of the government and share in the recovery.  The whistleblower in this case will receive $405,000.  The Justice Department has recovered $10.2 billion in healthcare fraud cases since January 2009.  The Justice Department’s total recoveries in False Claims Act cases since January 2009 are over $14 billion.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

CHG, Parent to Pay $18.5M for Time Card Fraud, Guilty Whistleblower Gets Nothing

March 11, 2013

Colorado-based CH2M Hill Hanford Group (CHG) and its parent company CH2M Hill Companies Ltd. (CH2M Hill) admitted to criminal conduct when CHG engaged in years of widespread time card fraud  on the U.S. Department of Energy. Between 1999 and 2008, CH2M Hill had a federal contract to manage and clean 177 large underground storage tanks containing mixed radioactive and hazardous waste at the Department of Energy’s Hanford Nuclear Site in southeastern Washington. The Hanford Site was used for the production of nuclear weapons during World War II and the Cold War. CHG hourly employees involved in the cleanup routinely overstated the number of hours they worked,  and CHG management not only condoned the practice---submitting inflated claims to the Department of Energy that included the fraudulently claimed hours--but certain supervisors engaged in patterns designed to avoid the detection of the routine time card fraud by law enforcement and internal auditors.  So far, eight individuals have pleaded guilty to the fraud scheme and conspiracy.

CH2M Hill will pay $16.5 million to resolve its civil liability under the False Claims Act, refund an additional $1.95 million in wrongfully obtained profits, dedicate $500,000 to increasing accountability at the Hanford site, and pay for independent monitoring.  The allegations were originally brought under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act by Carl Schroeder, a former employee of CH2M Hill, and one of those to plead guilty to the scheme.  Under the False Claims Act, private citizens can sue on behalf of the United States and share in the recovery.   The act, however, bars whistleblowers from recovering if they were convicted based on their role in the scheme.  Thus, Schroeder will not receive any share of the recovery.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content