The Chanler Group

NJ Residents Tested for Chromium, a Chemical TCG Clients Have Investigated

March 26, 2013

Some residents of Garfield, New Jersey will have their toenail clippings analyzed and measured for hexavalent chromium, the Associated Press reported.  Hexavalent chromium is a chemical known to the State of California to cause reproductive harm and cancer (more specifically, lung, nasal, and sinus cancer, according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)).  Because toenails grow slowly, the researchers will be able to analyze how much chromium has accumulated in the body over the past 18 months.  Researchers hope to test 250 residents.

Thirty years ago, a spill occurred at the EC Electroplating Company site, located in a residential neighborhood, and chromium was later found in a firehouse and nearby homes.  Residents were cautioned to stay out of their basements in order to avoid exposing themselves to the chromium, which had leached into the groundwater.  The chromium has since traveled into the neighboring city of Passiac, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is currently monitoring how far the chemical has spread.  Testing continues of homes and schools around the site of the original spill, which has been designated a Superfund site, among the nation’s most toxic uncontrolled hazardous waste sites.

Hexavalent chromium compounds are used for leather tanning, fungicides, wood preservation, electroplating, and as anti-corrosion agents, among other things.  It is also a by-product of processes such as welding and the manufacture of stainless steel.  The CDC calls it “a well-established carcinogen associated with lung, nasal, and sinus cancer.”  California has designated hexavalent chromium as a chemical known to cause cancer and reproductive harm, meaning that any product sold or distributed in California that exposes consumers to hexavalent chromium must be accompanied by a Proposition 65 health hazard warning.

Michael DiPirro, a longtime client of The Chanler Group, has obtained settlements with companies such as Amazon.com, Hilti, and Ingersoll-Rand for not including the required health hazard warnings that consumers would be exposed to hexavalent chromium, when they sold or rented sandblasters, power drills, and other power tools to residents in the State of California.  The Chanler Group represents citizen enforcers such as DiPirro who, acting in the public interest, commence actions against businesses offering products for sale in California that contain chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm without first providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65.  Such citizen enforcers may obtain a Court judgment imposing civil penalties, an injunction requiring reformulation of products, and/or provision of health hazard warnings.

Cross-Post On: 
None

OEHHA Intends to List Cyanide As Reproductive Toxicant

March 22, 2013

The California Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) issued a Notice of Intent to List hydrogen cyanide and cyanide salts as chemicals known to the State to cause reproductive harm (male reproductive toxicity endpoint).  OEHHA’s notice of intent is based on findings from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Hydrogen cyanide and cyanide salts are used in mining, metallurgy, photography, electroplating, and in some insect- and rodenticides.  They are also released from burning yard waste and are also components of tobacco smoke.  If OEHHA decides to formally add hydrogen cyanide and cyanide salts to the list of chemicals known to cause reproductive harm, businesses that offer products for sale containing such chemicals will have a year from the date of listing to provide a health hazard warning to individuals that use such products.

The Chanler Group represents citizen enforcers who, acting in the public interest, commence actions against businesses offering products for sale in California that contain chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm without first providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65. Citizen enforcers bringing Proposition 65 actions in the public interest may obtain a Court Judgment imposing civil penalties, an injunction requiring reformulation of products, and/or provision of health hazard warnings. The Chanler Group has represented citizen enforcers of Proposition 65 for more than twenty years.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Visual Horizons, Inc.

Date: 
January 24, 2013
Industry Categories: 

The parties executed a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Visual Horizons Inc. on January 24, 2013, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer’s allegations that the defendant Visual Horizons, Inc. (“Visual Horizons”) sold plastic/vinyl/PVC checkbook covers containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings. 

Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Visual Horizons, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Winsome Trading, Inc.

Date: 
January 16, 2013

The parties involved in the enforcement action Moore v. Winsome Trading, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on January 16, 2013, which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore’s allegations that the defendant Winsome Trading, Inc. (“Winsome”) sold stools with vinyl seats containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings. 

Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Winsome Trading, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Warnings, Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. FKA Distributing Co., Homedics-U.S.A., Inc.

Date: 
January 22, 2013

On January 22, 2013, the parties executed a Consent Judgment in Moore v. FKA Distributing Co., et al., which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore’s allegations that the defendants FKA Distributing Co. (“FKA”) and Homedics-U.S.A., Inc. (“Homedics”) sold portable speaker cases containing the phthalate chemicals di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) and di-n-butyl phthalate (“DBP”) and folding beds/mats containing DEHP and DBP in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings. 

Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
FKA Distributing Co., Homedics-U.S.A., Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Warnings, Reformulation
Monetary: 
$70,000-$79,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Fiskars Brands, Inc.

Date: 
February 20, 2013

In the enforcement action Moore v. Fiskars Brands, Inc., the parties executed a Consent Judgment on February 20, 2013, which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore’s allegations that the defendant Fiskars Brands, Inc. (“Fiskars”) sold tools with grips containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings. 

Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Fiskars Brands, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Vendor Notification
Monetary: 
$150,000-$159,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Exclusive Imports, Inc.

Date: 
January 10, 2013
Industry Categories: 

In the enforcement action Moore v. Exclusive Imports, Inc., the parties executed a Consent Judgment on January 10, 2013, which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore’s allegations that the defendant Exclusive Imports, Inc. (“Exclusive Imports”) sold ID cases containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings. 

Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Exclusive Imports, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Warnings, Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Croscill Home LLC

Date: 
January 7, 2013

The parties involved in the case Moore v. Croscill Home LLC executed a Consent Judgment on January 7, 2013, which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore’s allegations that the defendant Croscill Home LLC (“Croscill”) sold curtains containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings. 

Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Croscill Home LLC
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$40,000-$49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Bytech NY, Inc.

Date: 
January 30, 2013
Industry Categories: 

In the enforcement action Moore v. Bytech NY, Inc., the parties executed a Consent Judgment on January 30, 2013, which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore’s allegations that the defendant Bytech NY, Inc. (“Bytech”) sold cases with zipper pulls containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings. 

Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Bytech NY, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Warnings, Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Kiss Nail Products, Inc., et al.

Date: 
January 23, 2013
Industry Categories: 

The defendants Kiss Nail Products, Inc. and Kiss Products, Inc. (collectively “Kiss”) and citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E., executed a Consent Judgment on January 23, 2013, which resolved Held's allegations that Kiss sold cosmetic cases/bags containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings. 

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Kiss Nail Products, Inc., Kiss Products, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$100,000-$109,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content