60-Day Notice

Standards & Compliance Briefing: OfficeMax, Ross Lawsuits; Chinatrust; WEEE Overhaul— at Environmental Leader

April 18, 2013

Excerpted from the full article at the Environmental Leader:

OfficeMax, Ross Stores and Kinwai USA are among the nine manufacturers and retailers that law firm The Chanler Group is suing under California’s Proposition 65. The group has also served more than 100 violation notices on leading furniture manufacturers and retailers, including Ashley Furniture, Best Buy, Costco, Kohl’s, Pier 1 and the TJX Companies, alleging the unlabelled use of flame retardants TDCPP and TCEP (both also known as Tris).  link to source

Cross-Post On: 
None

Firm to list companies that come up ‘clean' on Prop 65— by Heath E. Combs at Furniture Today

April 18, 2013

Excerpted from full article at Furniture Today:

Proposition 65 legal firm The Chanler Group says it plans to publish a list of furniture manufacturers that have come up "clean" in testing for toxic flame retardants.

The Chanler Group has served more than 100 sixty-day notices of violation on furniture manufacturers alleging the presence of the flame retardant chemicals TDCPP and TCEP in their products, according to Clifford Chanler, founder of The Chanler Group.

Thus far in 2013, about 140 total notices for furniture violations of Prop 65 have been issued.

The notices filed give furniture suppliers 60 days to respond, after which the attorney general can decide to pursue civil cases. As the first 60-day notices expired last month, the first civil court case complaints followed.

Prop 65 is a state law requiring point-of-sale notification by manufacturers to consumers of chemicals known to the state to cause cancer, birth defects or from reproductive harm. The law, passed in 1986, doesn't require elimination of the chemical, but allows citizen plaintiffs to cite companies for lack of proper notice for listed chemicals.

TDCPP is used in foam to help meet California's TB 117 upholstery flammability standard - a standard the state is in the process of revising.

The Chanler Group plans to release details soon on the first settlement in a TDCPP Prop 65 notification this year, which should give companies guidance on how the firm will handle complaints, Chanler said. link to source

Cross-Post On: 
None

Chanler Group Serves Over 100 Prop 65 Notices On Flame Retardants

April 16, 2013

The Chanler Group has served more than 100 “Sixty-Day Notices of Violation” on leading furniture manufacturers alleging the presence of flame retardants TDCPP and TCEP, referred to more simply as Tris, in their products.  The Chanler Group’s clients, Peter Englander, Laurence Vinocur, and John Moore assert that unwarned exposure to Tris is a violation of Proposition 65, California’s unique right-to-know statute.  TDCPP was added to the list of toxic chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer in October 2011 under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65).

On behalf of its clients, The Chanler Group has also filed lawsuits against nine major manufacturers and retailers, demanding action be taken to properly label their products in compliance with California’s Proposition 65.  The lawsuits come after previously served Sixty-Day Notices of Violation expired without being enforced by public prosecutors.  Companies facing lawsuits include Officemax Inc., Ross Stores Inc., and Kinwai USA.

The Chanler Group and its clients immediately began an investigation of TDCPP after it was listed by OEHHA in October of 2011.  This investigation, conducted throughout the one-year listing period, uncovered numerous products containing high levels of Tris that were being sold in California without health hazard warnings.

TDCPP and TCEP are commonly added to household furniture to meet National Fire Safety Standards. Prop 65 requires companies to provide proper consumer warnings for all products containing toxic chemicals listed under the Act.

“Our goal is to protect the public from unwarned exposures to hazardous chemicals by enforcing the requirements of Prop 65,” said Clifford Chanler, founder and spokesperson for The Chanler Group.  “TDCPP is a dangerous chemical found in common household furniture such as couches, stools, and ottomans.  It was important to us that we file these notices in a timely manner to make consumers aware of the presence of these toxins.”

Upon the expiration of the one-year listing period in October 2012, the Chanler Group began more substantive investigations, including purchasing certain products known to contain polyurethane foam, a component to which TDCPP can be added. The Chanler Group has since issued over 100 notices to many furniture retailers and manufacturers including Ashley Furniture, Basset Furniture, Best Buy, Costco, Flexsteel Industries, Kohl’s Department Stores, Officemax, Pier 1, Ross Stores, and The TJX Companies.

Prior to legal action, each item was thoroughly tested for the presence of Tris Phosphate by a certified laboratory.  “The group and its clients have independently purchased and tested hundreds of products that contain chemicals known to violate Prop 65. Of those products tested, a significant portion contained levels of TDCPP that necessitate a consumer warning,” said Chanler. 

It appears that TDCPP and TCEP are intentionally added to the products that the firm’s clients have investigated, and it is anticipated that the majority of proposed future settlement agreements will initiate reformulation of the products so that there is no “detectable” TDCPP or TCEP in the commercial items.

The Chanler Group partnered with Moscone Emblidge Sater & Otis on 12 of the notices, and the two law firms will move forward together should the manufacturers fail to comply with Proposition 65 in the given 60-day window.  Moscone Emblidge Sater & Otis is a San Francisco-based law firm with experience in a wide range of practice areas, including business litigation and public affairs. 

The Chanler Group represents citizen enforcers and whistleblowers to promote awareness of toxic chemicals found in our everyday environment and to enhance the health of the general public by advocating for the removal of chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm from consumer products.  The Chanler Group and its clients apply over 20 years of knowledge and experience to their ongoing enforcement activities with the goal of holding those responsible for toxic exposures accountable for their violations of state and federal law. 

The Chanler Group’s clients have also negotiated the reformulation of hundreds of commonly used products with their manufacturers, eliminating chemicals known to cause cancer or birth defects.  Some of those manufacturers now produce only non-toxic products.  Additionally, The Chanler Group has been instrumental in generating over $100 million in civil fines and other funds for projects that educate children, workers and consumers about precautions they can take to significantly reduce toxic chemical exposure. The Chanler Group’s ongoing efforts effectuate change for a cleaner environment.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Steelite International PLC

Date: 
December 20, 2007
Industry Categories: 

In the enforcement action Brimer v. Royal Doulton USA, Inc., et al., the Honorable Nancy L. Davis approved a Consent Judgment on December 20, 2007.  The Consent Judgment included an opt-in program which provided citizen enforcer Russell Brimer with the ability to send 60-Day Notices of Violation to each entity that submitted an Opt-In Stipulation.  On April 29, 2008, settling defendant Steelite International PLC and its subsidiaries Steelite International USA Inc.

Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Steelite International PLC
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Warnings, Reformulation
Monetary: 
$0-$9,999
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

TCG Clients Issue 13 New 60-Day Notices Re: Phthalates and Flame Retardants

April 11, 2013

Peter Englander, John Moore, and Laurence Vinocur--clients of The Chanler Group--today served thirteen 60-Day Notices of Violation of Proposition 65 on companies offering furniture and other products for sale in California that contain chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm, without the required health hazard warning.  TCG's citizen enforcers allege that the companies' products contain the phthalate DEHP and the flame retardant chemicals TDCPP and TCEP.  DEHP is known to cause birth defects and reproductive harm, while TDCPP and TCEP are known to cause cancer.  Some of the noticed companies include Bexco Enterprises, Toys R Us, and Lifestyle Solutions.

See below for a partial list of notices.

 

Product Chemical Alleged Violator Citizen Enforcer
Padded Upholstered Furniture including Ottomans
 
TDCPP Bexco Enterprises, Inc. Englander
Nursing Pillows TDCPP Kids II, Inc.; Toys "R" Us, Inc.
 
Vinocur
Padded Upholstered  Sofas
 
TDCPP Style-Line Furn., Inc.; J. C. Penney Company, Inc. Englander
Padded Upholstered Furniture including Chairs
 
TDCPP Theodore Alexander USA, Inc. Englander
Vinyl/PVC Coffee Tables DEHP Lifestyle Solutions, Inc.
 
Englander
Chairs with Vinyl/PVC Seats DEHP Unaka Company, Incorporated; Meco Corporation Vinocur

 

Read the most recent notices issued by clients of The Chanler Group

Cross-Post On: 
None

Seven States Introduce Laws to Limit Use of Toxic Flame Retardants

April 11, 2013

Rising public concern and the Chicago Tribune’s investigative series on the toxic nature of common flame retardants found in upholstered foam furniture has given rise to new state legislation aimed at restricting or banning these flame retardant chemicals, Prop 65 News reported recently.

California, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Vermont, and Washington have all introduced legislation that would ban or restrict the use of flame retardant chemicals known as chlorinated Tris (including TDCPP and TCEP), with a few directed at other flame retardant chemicals such as PBDEs and decaBDE.  Many of the proposed bills ban the use of specific flame retardant chemicals in children’s and infant care products.  These flame retardant chemicals are released from the furniture and end up in household dust, which is then swallowed by pets, children, and adults.

The flame retardant chemicals TDCPP, TCEP, and TDBPP have been designated by the State of California as known to cause cancer.  Under Proposition 65, consumer products containing chemicals known to cause cancer cannot be offered for sale in California unless a health hazard warning is provided.  The Chanler Group’s citizen enforcer clients have issued dozens of 60-Day Notices of Violation to furniture manufacturers and retailers, alleging the manufacture and sale of products containing TDCPP or TCEP in California without the required health hazard warning.

A proposed revision to California’s Technical Bulletin 117, governing fire safety standards in furniture, may lead to reform in the furniture manufacturing industry.  At present, TB-117 requires that all upholstered foam furniture be able to withstand 12 seconds of a small open flame, such as from a candle.  The revision, TB-117-2013, proposes changing the fire safety standard to require a smolder test on the upholstery rather than an open flame test on the foam, and may lead to a decrease in flame retardant chemicals in residential furniture.

The Chanler Group represents citizen enforcers who, acting in the public interest, commence actions against businesses offering products for sale in California that contain chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm without first providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65. Citizen enforcers bringing Proposition 65 actions in the public interest may obtain a Court Judgment imposing civil penalties, an injunction requiring reformulation of products, and/or provision of health hazard warnings. The Chanler Group has represented citizen enforcers of Proposition 65 for more than twenty years.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Three Proposition 65 lawsuits filed against US food suppliers— by Rebecca Prescott at FoodBev.com

April 3, 2013

Excerpted from the full article at FoodBev.com:

The Chanler Group, a US environmental law firm, has filed Proposition 65 civil complaints against three prominent US food suppliers.

Spice and flavouring manufacturer McCormick & Company, coffee and flavouring manufacturer Farmer Bros and Adams Extract & Spice.

The complaints charge the three defendants with distributing food extracts, flavours and colourings containing unacceptable levels of the carcinogenic chemical 4-MEI, or 4-Methylimidazole, without a proper consumer warning label.

The Chanler Group had previously issued 60-day notices of violation, urging the manufacturers to comply with California's Proposition 65 requirements. The state law calls for manufacturers and retailers to label products containing known carcinogenic toxins with a warning to inform consumers prior to exposure.  link to source

Cross-Post On: 
None

TCG Clients Serve 16 New 60-Day Notices of Violation

April 3, 2013

Russell Brimer, Peter Englander, and Laurence Vinocur--three clients of The Chanler Group--today served sixteen 60-Day Notices of Violation of Proposition 65 on companies offering products for sale in the State of California that contain chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm, without the required health hazard warning.  Chemicals allegedly found in the companies' products include the flame retardants TDCPP and TCEP as well as the phthalate DEHP and the heavy metal lead.

See below for a partial list of notices.

 

Product Chemical Alleged Violator Citizen Enforcer
Vinyl/PVC Grip Clips DEHP Big Time Products, LLC
 
Englander
Vinyl/PVC Hand Truck Grips
 
DEHP Gleason Corporation
 
Englander
Stools with Vinyl/PVC Seats
 
DEHP Hoshino (U.S.A.) Inc.
 
Vinocur
Vinyl/PVC Hand Tool Grips DEHP Midwest Rake Company, LLC; Seymour Manufacturing Co Inc
 
Englander
Chairs with Vinyl/PVC Seats DEHP Winners Only, Inc. Englander

 

Read the most recent notices issued by clients of The Chanler Group

Cross-Post On: 
None

The Chanler Group Files Three Lawsuits Against National Food Suppliers Over Prop 65 for Environmentalists

April 2, 2013

BERKELEY, Calif. – April 2, 2013 – The Chanler Group (www.chanler.com), a Connecticut-based environmental law firm, has filed Proposition 65 civil complaints on behalf of Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D., against three prominent national food suppliers: spice and flavoring manufacturer McCormick & Company, Inc.; coffee and flavoring manufacturer Farmer Bros. Co.; as well as Adams Extract & Spice, LLC.  All complaints are filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, San Francisco County for the firm’s client. The complaints charge the three defendants with distributing food extracts, flavors and colorings containing unacceptable levels of the carcinogenic chemical 4-MEI, or 4-Methylimidazole, without a proper consumer warning label.

The Chanler Group had previously issued 60-day notices of violation, urging the manufacturers to comply with California's Proposition 65 requirements.  The state law calls for manufacturers and retailers to label products containing known carcinogenic toxins with a warning to inform consumers prior to exposure.  The 4-MEI compound is frequently added to food products for its caramel color.  It was first added to Prop. 65's list of chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer in January of 2011.

“This particular compound has been listed as a carcinogen for two years now, but many products still contain the toxic chemical without the labeling required by law,” said Clifford Chanler, founder and spokesperson for The Chanler Group.  “The safety of consumers is important to us.  These three companies are united by a responsibility to either remove the toxic chemicals from their manufacturing processes, or to label those products in compliance with the law.”

Beginning in 2012, The Chanler Group independently purchased a variety of products from McCormick & Company, Inc., Farmer Bros. Co., and Adams Extract & Spice, LLC.  The products were then tested in a certified laboratory, where significant levels of 4-MEI were detected.  The 4-MEI compound is also commonly found in pharmaceuticals, photographic chemicals, dyes, pigments, cleaning products, and rubber products.

The three civil complaints call for injunctive action on the part of the court, which would compel McCormick & Company, Inc., Farmer Bros. Co., and Adams Extract & Spice, LLC to either change their manufacturing processes to reduce or eliminate the presence of 4-MEI, or to clearly label all products containing the chemical.  Chanler Group is also seeking civil penalties, 75% of which are payable to California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, against these defendants in accordance with California's Health and Safety Code.

The Chanler Group represents citizen enforcers and whistleblowers who promote awareness of toxic chemicals found in our everyday environment and to enhance the health of the general public by advocating for the removal of chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm from consumer products.  The Chanler Group and its clients apply over 20 years of knowledge and experience to their ongoing enforcement activities with the goal of holding those responsible for toxic exposures accountable for their violations of state and federal law. 

In addition to strict compliance with the law, The Chanler Group’s clients have forced hundreds of companies to reformulate commonly used products, eliminating chemicals that are known to cause cancer or birth defects.  Some of those companies now manufacture only non-toxic products.  Additionally, The Chanler Group has been instrumental in generating over $100 million in civil fines and other funds for projects that educate children, workers and consumers about precautions they can take to significantly reduce toxic chemical exposure.  The Chanler Group’s ongoing efforts effectuate change for a cleaner environment.  For more information, please visit www.chanler.com.

Gary Pike, APR
(415) 585-2100         
gary@pikeandcompany.com                      

Cross-Post On: 
None

EPA to Conduct Risk Assessments on Flame Retardant Chemicals

April 1, 2013

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced last week that it will begin assessments of 23 commonly used chemicals, with a specific focus on flame retardants, in order to understand potential risks to people and the environment.

The list includes 20 flame retardant chemicals, four of which will undergo full risk assessments.  Those four are:

  • Tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP)
  • 2-Ethylhexyl ester 2,3,4,5- tetrabromobenzoate (TBB)
  • 1,2- Ethylhexyl 3,4,5,6-tetrabromo-benzenedicarboxylate or (2-ethylhexyl)-3,4,5,6 tetrabromophthalate (TBPH)
  • Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD)

The other flame retardant chemicals on the list currently lack enough data to undergo full assessments, but eight of these chemicals with similar characteristics will be grouped with the four listed above.

TCEP, one of the flame retardant chemicals undergoing a full risk assessment, has been on California’s Proposition 65 list of chemicals known to cause cancer since 1992.  Under Proposition 65, companies cannot offer products containing TCEP for sale in California without first providing a health hazard warning to consumers and users of the products.  Clients of The Chanler Group have discovered many products containing TCEP for sale in California without the required warning, such as chairs, stools, ottomans, pillows, and more, and have served dozens of 60-Day Notices of Proposition 65 Violations on the manufacturers of these products.

The Chanler Group represents citizen enforcers who, acting in the public interest, commence actions against businesses offering products for sale in California that contain chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm without first providing the health hazard warning required by Proposition 65. Citizen enforcers bringing Proposition 65 actions in the public interest may obtain a Court Judgment imposing civil penalties, an injunction requiring reformulation of products, and/or provision of health hazard warnings. The Chanler Group has represented citizen enforcers of Proposition 65 for more than twenty years.

Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content