featured cases
firm casework - enforcement
April 21, 2006
Consent Judgment
Summerwood Winery & Inn, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 21, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the...
April 21, 2006
Consent Judgment
Tablas Creek Vineyard elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 21, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
April 19, 2006
Consent Judgment
The Santa Clara Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on April 19, 2006, in Brimer v. Dave & Busters, Inc.; et al. In this matter, whistleblower Russell Brimer alleged that Dave & Busters, Inc. ("Dave and Busters") sold shot glasses and other glassware and ceramicware intended to hold food and/or beverages with colored artwork that contain the heavy...
April 12, 2006
Consent Judgment
Behn of North America elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
April 12, 2006
Consent Judgment
The Cricket Company, LLC elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
April 12, 2006
Consent Judgment
Direct Retailing, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
April 12, 2006
Consent Judgment
Edna Valley Vineyard elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
April 12, 2006
Consent Judgment
John T’s Newark, dba John T’s Unique Gifts elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to...
Search Our Site
Subscribe to Our Blogs
Sign up for our newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest important news from The Chanler Group
Contact Our Team
Use our online contact form, or visit our offices page for more details on how to reach us.
Want to apply for a grant? Check out our Grant Seeker FAQ.
If you want to contact a whistleblower attorney, please take a look at our Whistleblower Questionnaire.