Lunardi’s Super Market, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
Longs Drug Stores California, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 31, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
In the case Brimer v. Lion Supermarket, et al., the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on August 8, 2007. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendant Lion Supermarket ("Lion") sold glass bottles and other glassware with colored artwork containing the heavy metal lead on the exterior in the State of California...
Lifetime Brands, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
The Lang Companies, LLC elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Lab Safety Supply, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on May 5, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 6, 2006 . In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
The Honorable Paul H. Alvarado from the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Konocti Harbor Resort & Spa, et al., on June 1, 2007. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that defendant Konocti Harbor Resort & Spa ("Konocti") sold shooters and other glassware with colored artwork containing the heavy...
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in the case of Brimer v. Kohl's Corporation, et al. on November 29, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendant Kohl's Corporation ("Kohl's") manufactured, distributed, and/or sold certain glass containers intended to hold beverages with colored artwork,...
Knott’s Berry Farm and Cedar Fair, L.P. (collectively “Knotts Berry Farm”) elected to address their Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 19, 2005. In doing so, Knotts Berry Farm became a member of...
