Proposition 65
October 5, 2016
The parties involved in the case Leeman v. Enermax USA Corporation executed a Consent Judgment on October 5, 2016. In this matter, citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D., P.E. alleged that Ecomaster Technology Corp., fka Enermax USA Corporation (“Ecomaster”) sold vinyl/PVC earphone cords containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, DEHP, Ecomaster Technology Corp., Phthalates, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Vinyl/PVC Earphone Cords, Whistleblower, Whitney R. Leeman
November 7, 2016
On November 7, 2016, citizen enforcer John Moore and settling party Tri-Coastal Design Group, Inc. (“Tri-Coastal”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement. Moore had alleged that Tri-Coastal sold mugs with exterior designs containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.
As part of...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, John Moore, Lead, Mugs with Exterior Designs, Out-of-Court Settlement, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Tri-Coastal Design Group Inc., Whistleblower
October 7, 2016
The parties involved in the case Leeman v. Pacific Cycle Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on October 7, 2016. In this matter, citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D., P.E. alleged that Pacific Cycle Inc. (“Pacific”) sold vinyl/PVC audio cords or cables containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, DEHP, Pacific Cycle Inc., Phthalates, Proposition 65, Reformulation, vinyl/PVC audio cords or cables, Whistleblower, Whitney R. Leeman
November 2, 2016
The parties involved in the case Vinocur v. Wayne/Scott Fetzer Company executed a Consent Judgment on November 2, 2016. In this matter, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur alleged that Wayne/Scott Fetzer Company (“Wayne/Scott”) sold vinyl/PVC tubing containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, DEHP, Laurence Vinocur, Phthalates, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Vinyl/PVC Tubing, Wayne/Scott Fetzer Company, Whistleblower
October 31, 2016
The parties involved in the case Brimer v. M. Jacob & Sons, dba Sprayco executed a Consent Judgment on October 31, 2016. In this matter, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that M. Jacob & Sons, dba Sprayco (“Defendant”) sold metal sprayer nozzles containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, Lead, M. Jacob & Sons, dba Sprayco, Metal Sprayer Nozzles, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Russell Brimer, Whistleblower
October 27, 2016
The parties involved in the case Moore v. TAP Plastics, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on October 27, 2016. In this matter, citizen enforcer John Moore alleged that TAP Plastics, Inc. (“TAP”) sold vinyl/PVC tool grips and vinyl/PVC tubing containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, DEHP, John Moore, Phthalates, Proposition 65, Reformulation, TAP Group LLC, Vinyl/PVC Tool Grips, Vinyl/PVC Tubing, Whistleblower
October 31, 2016
On October 31, 2016, citizen enforcer Laurence Vinocur and settling party Milan Pacific USA LLC (“Milan Pacific”) entered into an out-of-court settlement agreement. Vinocur had alleged that Milan Pacific sold business card holders containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State of California without providing the...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Business Card Holders, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, DEHP, Laurence Vinocur, Milan Pacific USA LLC, Out-of-Court Settlement, Phthalates, Proposition 65, Whistleblower
October 17, 2016
The parties involved in the case Held v. Pasco Specialty & Mfg, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on October 17, 2016. In this matter, citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held alleged that Pasco Specialty & Mfg, Inc.(“Pasco”) sold tools with vinyl/PVC grips containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DINP”) in the State of...
Anthony E. Held, Cancer, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, DINP, Pasco Specialty & Mfg, Inc., Phthalates, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Tools with Vinyl/PVC Grips, Whistleblower
October 12, 2016
The parties involved in the case Leeman v. Beam Suntory Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on October 12, 2016. In this matter, citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D., P.E. alleged that Beam Suntory Inc. (“Beam”) sold drinking glasses with exterior designs containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health...
Beam Suntory Inc., Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, Drinking Glasses with Exterior Designs, Lead, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Whistleblower, Whitney R. Leeman
October 18, 2016
The parties involved in the case Moorberg v. International Sourcing Company, Inc. executed a Consent Judgment on October 18, 2016. In this matter, citizen enforcer Mark Moorberg alleged that International Sourcing Company, Inc. (“International”) sold vinyl/PVC gloves containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (“DEHP”) in the State...
Birth Defects and Other Reproductive Harm, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Consent Judgment, DEHP, International Sourcing Company, Inc., Mark Moorberg, Phthalates, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Vinyl/PVC Gloves, Whistleblower
Search Our Site
Subscribe to Our Blogs
Sign up for our newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest important news from The Chanler Group
Contact Our Team
Use our online contact form, or visit our offices page for more details on how to reach us.
Want to apply for a grant? Check out our Grant Seeker FAQ.
If you want to contact a whistleblower attorney, please take a look at our Whistleblower Questionnaire.