Proposition 65
Aldo, Cadmium, California Attorney General, California District Attorney, California Health and Safety Code sections 25249.5 25249.13, Cancer, Children’s products, Chromium, Chromium in auto paints, Civil fines, Civil penalties, Coca-Cola, Corning, Distributor of consumer products, Dr. Pepper, Groups acting in the public interest, Hazardous chemicals, Importers of consumer products, Kate Spade, Lead, Lead in dishware, Lead In glass soda bottles, Lead in grips of hand tools, Lead in utensils, Mandated warnings, Manufacturer of consumer products, Maximum Allowable Dose, Maybelline, Inc., Mikasa, Inc., Nine West, No Significant Risk Level, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”), Opt-in Settlements, Pepsi, Phthalates, Proposition 65, Reproductive Harm, Retailer of Consumer Products, Revlon, Right to know law, Safe Harbor Levels, State of California, Superior Court of California, The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, Toluene in nail polish, Wedgewood
February 24, 1995
In the enforcement action As You Sow v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, the Honorable Stuart R. Pollak of the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on February 24, 1995. In this matter, the not-for-profit public interest foundation As You Sow (“AYS”), represented by Cliff Chanler, alleged that the defendant E. I. du Pont de...
antimony, As You Sow, automotive paints, Chromium, Citizen Enforcer, Citizens for a Better Environment, crystalline silica, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Formaldehyde, Lead, Lead compounds, methylene chloride, Nickel, nickel compounds, Proposition 65, Proposition 65 Investigation Fund, Proposition 65 Warning, Santa Clara Center for Occupational Health and Safety, Toluene, West County Toxics Coalition, Whistleblower
antimony, Chromium, Crystalline Silica, Formaldehyde, Lead, lead compounds, Methylene Chloride, Nickel, nickel compounds, Toluene
October 23, 2012
The Honorable Mark H. Pierce of the Santa Clara County Superior Court granted the parties’ motion to approve the Consent Judgment in the case Brimer et al. v. 3M Company, et al., on October 23, 2012. This enforcement action resolved citizen enforcers Russell Brimer, John Moore, and Peter Englander’s allegations that sixteen defendants, including Woodstream...
Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, DEHP, Hand Tool Group, Hand Tools, Moore, Peter Englander, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Russell Brimer, vendor notification, Whistleblower, Woodstream Corporation
October 23, 2012
The Honorable Mark H. Pierce of the Santa Clara County Superior Court granted the parties’ motion to approve the Consent Judgment in the case Brimer et al. v. 3M Company, et al., on October 23, 2012. This enforcement action resolved citizen enforcers Russell Brimer, John Moore, and Peter Englander’s allegations that sixteen defendants, including Wire and...
BBP, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, DBP, DEHP, Hand Tool Group, Hand Tools, Moore, Peter Englander, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Russell Brimer, vendor notification, Whistleblower, Wire and Cable Specialties, Inc.
October 23, 2012
The Honorable Mark H. Pierce of the Santa Clara County Superior Court granted the parties’ motion to approve the Consent Judgment in the case Brimer et al. v. 3M Company, et al., on October 23, 2012. This enforcement action resolved citizen enforcers Russell Brimer, John Moore, and Peter Englander’s allegations that sixteen defendants, including Voxx...
Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, DEHP, Do It Best Corp. - DLS, Fry's Electronics, Inc., Hand Tool Group, Hand Tools, Ingram Micro, Moore, Peter Englander, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Russell Brimer, South Coastal & Lowes Companies Inc., vendor notification, Voxx Accessories Corporation, Whistleblower
October 23, 2012
The Honorable Mark H. Pierce of the Santa Clara County Superior Court granted the parties’ motion to approve the Consent Judgment in the case Brimer et al. v. 3M Company, et al., on October 23, 2012. This enforcement action resolved citizen enforcers Russell Brimer, John Moore, and Peter Englander’s allegations that sixteen defendants, including M&Y...
Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, DEHP, Hand Tool Group, Hand Tools, Helby Import Co., M&Y Trading Co., Moore, Peter Englander, Pliers with PVC Grips, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Russell Brimer, vendor notification, Whistleblower
October 23, 2012
The Honorable Mark H. Pierce of the Santa Clara County Superior Court granted the parties’ motion to approve the Consent Judgment in the case Brimer et al. v. 3M Company, et al., on October 23, 2012. This enforcement action resolved citizen enforcers Russell Brimer, John Moore, and Peter Englander’s allegations that sixteen defendants, including Newell...
BBP, Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, DBP, DEHP, Hand Tool Group, Hand Tools, Irwin Industrial Tool Company, Moore, Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., Peter Englander, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Russell Brimer, vendor notification, Whistleblower
October 23, 2012
The Honorable Mark H. Pierce of the Santa Clara County Superior Court granted the parties’ motion to approve the Consent Judgment in the case Brimer et al. v. 3M Company, et al., on October 23, 2012. This enforcement action resolved citizen enforcers Russell Brimer, John Moore, and Peter Englander’s allegations that sixteen defendants, including General Cage...
Citizen Enforcer, Civil penalties, Classic Products, DEHP, General Cage LLC, Hand Tool Group, Hand Tools, Moore, Pet Food Express, Pet Supplies, Peter Englander, Proposition 65, Reformulation, Russell Brimer, Scoops, vendor notification, Whistleblower
Search Our Site
Subscribe to Our Blogs
Sign up for our newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest important news from The Chanler Group
Contact Our Team
Use our online contact form, or visit our offices page for more details on how to reach us.
Want to apply for a grant? Check out our Grant Seeker FAQ.
If you want to contact a whistleblower attorney, please take a look at our Whistleblower Questionnaire.