Big Dog Holdings, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 15, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
The Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in DiPirro v. Hertz Big 4 Rents, Inc., et al. on May 30, 2001. This enforcement action resolved the allegations of citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro that defendants Big 4 Rents, Inc., Hertz Equipment Rental Corporation, and The Hertz Corporation (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Defendants")...
In the enforcement action Brimer v. Royal Doulton USA, Inc., et al., the Honorable Nancy L. Davis approved a Consent Judgment on December 20, 2007. The Consent Judgment included an opt-in program which provided citizen enforcer Russell Brimer with the ability to send 60-Day Notices of Violation to each entity that submitted an Opt-In Stipulation. On April 29, 2008...
On August 27, 2010, the Sacramento County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Held v. Beverly Fabrics, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E.'s allegations that the defendant, Beverly Fabrics, Inc. ("Beverly Fabrics"), sold plastic vinyl containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the...
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in the case Brimer v. Beverages & More, Inc., et al., on October 6, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendant Beverages & More, Inc. ("Beverages") sold certain glass sets, drinking glasses, glass soda bottles and other glassware with colored artwork,...
On March 2, 2009, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in DiPirro v. Best Data Products, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro's allegations that the defendant Best Data Products, Inc. dba Diamond Multimedia ("Best Data") sold modem cards with solder and products into which modem cards are integrated containing the heavy...
The parties executed an out-of-court Settlement Agreement on March 19, 2013, which resolved citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D.’s allegations that the settling party Berkeley Bowl Produce, Inc. (“Berkeley Bowl”) sold flame-cooked ground beef containing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, including benz[a]anthracene, benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene,...
On August 2, 2007, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Berkeley Bowl Marketplace, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendants Berkeley Bowl Marketplace and Berkley Bowl Produce, Inc. (collectively "Berkeley Bowl") sold glass jars and other glassware with colored artwork containing the...
Bergin Glass Impressions elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 19, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Bennington Potters, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
