Lead
Synonyms
- Pb
- Lead;
April 20, 2005
On April 20, 2005, the Superior Court of California for the City and County of San Francisco entered a Consent Judgment in Leeman v. Pier 1 Imports, Inc., et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Dr. Whitney R. Leeman's allegations that the defendant Pier 1 sold tumblers, stemware and other glassware with colored artwork or designs (containing lead) on the exterior in the...
April 6, 2006
PetSmart, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 6, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, PetSmart, Inc., Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
October 25, 2005
The Santa Clara Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in the case of Brimer v. Paramount Parks, Inc., et al. on October 25, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendant Paramount Parks ("Paramount") sold certain glassware with colored artwork, designs, or markings on the exterior surface with materials containing lead and/...
Cadmium, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Paramount Parks, Inc., Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
March 20, 2006
Paperproducts Design US Inc elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on March 20, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Paperproducts Design US Inc, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
June 19, 2006
Pacific Choice Brands, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 19, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Boelter, Cadmium, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Pacific Choice Brands, Inc., Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
December 19, 2005
Ozeki Sake (U.S.A.) Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Boelter, Cadmium, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Ozeki Sake (U.S.A.) Inc., Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
February 6, 2006
Orrefors Kosta Boda, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy...
Boelter, Cadmium, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Orrefors Kosta Boda, Inc., Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
April 12, 2006
Oriental Trading Company, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Oriental Trading Company, Inc., Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
February 6, 2006
Oneida Ltd. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
December 27, 2005
Oddity, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 27, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Oddity, Inc., Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
Search Our Site
Subscribe to Our Blogs
Sign up for our newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest important news from The Chanler Group
Contact Our Team
Use our online contact form, or visit our offices page for more details on how to reach us.
Want to apply for a grant? Check out our Grant Seeker FAQ.
If you want to contact a whistleblower attorney, please take a look at our Whistleblower Questionnaire.