In the enforcement action Brimer v. Royal Doulton USA, Inc., et al., the Honorable Nancy L. Davis approved a Consent Judgment on December 20, 2007. The Consent Judgment included an opt-in program which provided citizen enforcer Russell Brimer with the ability to send 60-Day Notices of Violation to each entity that submitted an Opt-In Stipulation. On April 29, 2008...
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in the case Brimer v. Beverages & More, Inc., et al., on October 6, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendant Beverages & More, Inc. ("Beverages") sold certain glass sets, drinking glasses, glass soda bottles and other glassware with colored artwork,...
On March 2, 2009, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in DiPirro v. Best Data Products, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro's allegations that the defendant Best Data Products, Inc. dba Diamond Multimedia ("Best Data") sold modem cards with solder and products into which modem cards are integrated containing the heavy...
On August 2, 2007, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Berkeley Bowl Marketplace, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendants Berkeley Bowl Marketplace and Berkley Bowl Produce, Inc. (collectively "Berkeley Bowl") sold glass jars and other glassware with colored artwork containing the...
Bergin Glass Impressions elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on June 19, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Bennington Potters, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
The Superior Court of California for the City and County of San Francisco entered a Consent Judgment on November 3, 2004 in Leeman v. Belkin Components, et al. The settlement resolved citizen enforcer Dr. Whitney R. Leeman's allegations that defendant Belkin manufactured, distributed or sold solder (containing lead) including those sold in computer tool kits in the State...
The enforcement action Leeman v. Bee International, Inc., et al. was resolved on January 16, 2007, when the Honorable Peter J. Busch entered a Consent Judgment. In this matter, citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D. alleged defendant Bee International, Inc. ("Bee") sold mugs and other ceramic containers with colored artwork on the exterior containing the heavy...
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Leeman v. Bad Bath & Beyond Inc., et al., on June 3, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman's allegations that defendant Bad Bath & Beyond Inc. ("Bed") distributed and/or sold glassware with colored designs and/or artwork on the exterior surface that contains lead and/or lead...
Bay Meadows Operating Co., LLC and Bay Meadows Racing Association (collectively “Bay Meadows”) elected to address their Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 29, 2005. In doing so, Bay Meadows became a...
