whistleblower act

Adventist Health Settles False Claims Charges for $14M; Whistleblowers to Get $2.8M

May 7, 2013

Adventist Health and its Los Angeles-based affiliated hospital White Memorial Medical Center have agreed to pay the United States and the State of California $14.1 million to settle allegations that they violated the Anti-Kickback Act, the Stark Statute, and the False Claims Act, the U.S. Department of Justice announced last week.

Adventist Health allegedly improperly compensated physicians who referred patients to the White Memorial facility by transferring assets, including medical and non-medical supplies and inventory, at less than fair market value.  Referring physicians also allegedly received compensation at above fair market value for providing teaching services at White Memorial’s family practice residency program.  The United States alleged that these payments violated the Anti-Kickback Act and Stark Statute, and by extension, the False Claims Act. The Anti-Kickback Act prohibits offering, paying, soliciting or receiving remuneration to induce referrals of items or services covered by Medicare, Medicaid and/or other federally-funded programs.  The Stark Statute prohibits a hospital from submitting claims for patient referrals made by a physician with whom the hospital has an improper financial arrangement.  By extension, White Memorial Medical Center violated the False Claims Act when it knowingly caused the submission of false claims to Medicare and/or Medicaid for patients who were referred to the hospital because of the kickbacks and not legitimate patient need.

As part of the settlement, White Memorial has entered into a comprehensive five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to ensure its continued compliance with federal health care benefit program requirements.

The lawsuit was originally filed by Dr. Hector Luque and Dr. Alejandro Gonzalez under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud to sue on behalf of the United States and share in a portion of the recovery.  Luque and Gonzalez will receive approximately $2.8 million as their share of the recovery in this case.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

U.S. Files 2nd Complaint Against Novartis Re: Kickbacks to Prescribing Doctors

May 1, 2013

The United States filed a second false claims action against Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. alleging that they paid kickbacks to doctors to induce them to prescribe Novartis pharmaceutical products that were reimbursed by federal health care programs, the Justice Department announced last week.

The government alleges that from January 2001 through November 2011, Novartis systematically violated the Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits payment of remuneration to induce referrals of items or services covered by Medicare, Medicaid, and other federally funded programs.  Novartis allegedly violated its own internal policies concerning speaker programs, which require that the programs have an educational purpose and that slides about the company’s drugs be presented.  Novartis allegedly violated the Anti-Kickback Statute by paying doctors to speak about certain drugs, including its hypertension drugs Lotrel and Valturna and its diabetes drug Starlix, at events that were often little or nothing more than social occasions for the doctors.  The payments and lavish dinners given to the doctors were, in reality, kickbacks to the speakers and attendees to induce them to write prescriptions for Novartis drugs.  In many instances Novartis made payments to doctors for purported speaker programs that either did not occur at all or that had few or no attendees, and thousands of programs were held all over the country at which few or no slides were shown and the doctors who participated spent little or no time discussing the drug at issue.

The government claims that Novartis was well aware that its speaker programs created opportunities to provide kickbacks to doctors.  In September 2010, Novartis entered into a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice to settle False Claims Act lawsuits based in part on violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute due to illegal remuneration paid to doctors through such mechanisms as speaker programs, and signed a corporate integrity agreement with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General agreeing to implement a rigorous compliance program.  Nonetheless, even after entering into the corporate integrity agreement, Novartis’s compliance program allegedly failed to prevent kickbacks from being paid in conjunction with Novartis’s speaker programs.

As a consequence of its alleged violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute, Novartis has caused the submission of numerous false claims for drugs to federal health care programs, including Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE and the Department of Veterans Affairs health care program, resulting in millions of dollars in reimbursements. Novartis’s unlawful conduct caused those false claims to be made to and paid by the federal health care programs.  

The lawsuit was originally brought by former Novartis sales representative Oswald Bilotta under the whistleblower provision of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud to sue on behalf of the government and share in the recovery.  The U.S. seeks treble damages and penalties under the False Claims Act as well as damages under the common law.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

U.S. Files Complaint Against Lance Armstrong Re: Fraud on USPS

April 24, 2013

The U.S. government filed its complaint against former cycling champion Lance Armstrong in Washington, D.C., Reuters reported yesterday.  Armstrong, now stripped of his seven Tour de France wins, is accused of defrauding his sponsor, the U.S. Postal Service, by taking millions of dollars in sponsorship money while at the same time engaging in prohibited substance and method use (“doping”).

The complaint alleges that the team, including Armstrong, “knowingly caused material violations of the sponsorship agreements by regularly and systematically employing banned substances and methods to enhance their performance…as a result, the Defendants submitted or caused to be submitted to the United States false or fraudulent invoices for payment.”  The complaint alleges that, “[T]he United States suffered damage in that it did not receive the value of services for which it bargained.”  The U.S. Postal Service paid $40 million to Armstrong and his teammates during their sponsorship.  Armstrong’s salary at that time, excluding bonuses, was $17.9 million.

Last summer, Armstrong ended his fight against years of doping allegations and was stripped of his Tour de France titles as well as his 2000 Olympic medal.  He has also been banned for life from professional cycling.  Earlier this year, Armstrong admitted to doping during a TV interview with Oprah Winfrey.

The allegations were originally made in a suit filed by Armstrong’s ex-teammate, Floyd Landis, under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud to sue on behalf of the government and share in the recovery.  If the government finds merit in the case, it may intervene, which it has done in this case.  Under the False Claims Act, the government may recover up to three times the amount of the loss attributable to fraud.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Amgen to Pay $24.9M to Resolve False Claims Allegations Re: Kickbacks

April 18, 2013

California-based biotechnology company Amgen, Inc. will pay the United States $24.9 million to settle allegations that Amgen knowingly caused the filing of false claims to the federal government, the U.S. Department of Justice announced.

Amgen allegedly gave kickbacks to pharmacy providers Omnicare, Inc., PharMerica Corporation, and Kindred Healthcare, Inc. in return for implementation of programs that were designed to switch Medicare and Medicaid patients from competitors’ drugs to Amgen’s version, Aranesp.  The alleged kickbacks took the form of performance-based rebates, and Amgen allegedly encouraged pharmacists and nursing home staff to use Aranesp even for patients who did not suffer from symptoms Aranesp was designed to treat.  Medicare and Medicaid were thus allegedly billed for the cost of drugs that patients did not need and that providers were influenced to prescribe or use.

The lawsuit was originally filed by Frank Kurnik, a former employee of Amgen, under the whistleblower provision of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud to sue on behalf of the government, and claim in a share of the recovery.  Kurnik’s reward has not yet been determined.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

IRS Holds Hearing on Tax Fraud Whistleblower Program

April 11, 2013

The U.S. Internal Revenue Service held a hearing on Wednesday to receive feedback on new rules and proposals for implementing elements of its whistleblower program, Reuters reported.  Some of these proposals include guidelines for whistleblower submissions, criteria for determining the size of whistleblower recoveries, and allowing whistleblowers who die during the process to leave award recovery to heirs.  Reuters also reported that attorneys representing tax informants gave IRS officials an earful during the hearing, complaining that whistleblowers have the impression that they “are just not welcome” at the IRS.

The IRS whistleblower program was revised in 2006 to allow whistleblowers to share from 15% to 30% of recoveries of $2 million or more, and established a new whistleblower office.  However, IRS whistleblowers have no legal protection against employer retaliation, there are no deadlines by which the IRS must decide the case, and the IRS is not required to communicate with the whistleblower after receiving a tip.

Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, who led the 2006 overhaul, wrote in February that “the government should work with whistleblowers to collect taxes that are due under current tax levels...whistleblowers are still left in the dark for years.  The IRS needs to do a lot more to give whistleblowers the confidence they need to take the risk of coming forward to expose tax fraud.”  He called the proposals, which were released in December, “disappointing.”

The National Whistleblowers Center and other advocates for whistleblower rights requested that the proposed IRS regulations should not be finalized in their current form.

The IRS is reportedly considering the comments submitted regarding the program before it makes a decision.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Fluor to Pay $1.1M to Settle Lobbying Claims; Whistleblower to Get $200K

April 3, 2013

Fluor Corp. has agreed to pay a $1.1 million settlement to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act when it allegedly used federal money to pay lobbyists, the U.S. Department of Justice announced today.

Fluor Hanford operated the Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency Response (HAMMER) training center for the Department of Energy from 2005 to 2009.  In 2005, HAMMER allegedly used federal money to hire two firms to lobby members of Congress and federal agencies for more money.  According to the terms of Fluor’s contract with the Department of Energy, federal money was intended for training first responders and law enforcement personnel to respond to crisis situations, not to lobby Congress for more funding.

Loydene Rambo, a former contracting official for HAMMER, filed the initial lawsuit against Fluor under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act.  The qui tam provisions allow a private citizen with knowledge of fraud to sue on behalf of the government and share in the recovery.  Rambo will receive $200,000 as her share of the settlement with Fluor.

Fluor released a statement on April 1st in which they denied any wrongdoing.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Court Upholds Whistleblowers' $6.9M Share of $46M False Claims Settlement

March 15, 2013

Earlier this month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit upheld the federal district court's decision that the two whistleblowers, or relators, in Rille et al v. Accenture, LLP et al, No. 11-2054 (8th Cir. 2013) were entitled to a 15% share of the federal government's $46 million False Claims Act settlement with Hewlett-Packard, amounting to a $6.9 million award to the whistleblowers.

The relators, Norman Rille and Neal Roberts, filed a <i>qui tam</i>, or whistleblower, action in 2004 against HP and other defendants on behalf of the United States, alleging that the defendants gave kickbacks to consultants in exchange for recommendations and engaged in pricing schemes that cost the federal government millions of dollars.

In 2006, the government intervened and filed its own complaint against HP and the other defendants, and eventually entered into a settlement in which the government received $55 million: $9 million from the kickback scheme and $46 million for the pricing scheme.  While the government conceded a share of the kickback settlement to the relators, it attributed the pricing settlement to its own investigation, and not the relators'.

The district court found in favor of the relators, writing that "the government had no knowledge of the defective pricing before Relators brought it to light."  The government appealed.  The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, upholding the whistleblowers' entitlement to 21% of the $9 million kickback settlement and 15% of the $46 pricing settlement.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Cross-Post On: 
None

Hospice of Ariz to Pay $12M for Medicare Fraud; Whistleblower to get $1.8M

March 20, 2013

Hospice of Arizona, L.C., American Hospice Management LLC, and American Hospice Management Holdings LLC, have agreed to pay $12 million to resolve allegations that they violated the False Claims Act by knowingly defrauding Medicare, the Department of Justice announced today.

Hospice of Arizona and its related entities allegedly engaged in practices that resulted in the admission of ineligible patients, inflated medical bills, and delayed and discouraged staff from discharging patients no longer eligible for hospice care.  As part of the settlement, American Hospice Management Holdings has agreed to enter a corporate integrity agreement with the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services that provides for procedures and reviews to be put in place to avoid and promptly detect similar misconduct.

Medicare hospice benefits are available to patients with a life expectancy of six months or fewer; these patients do not receive care intended to treat or stop their illnesses, and instead receive medical care focused on providing them with relief from the symptoms, pain, and stress of a terminal illness.

The allegations arose from a lawsuit filed by former Hospice of Arizona employee Ellen Momeyer, under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act.  The False Claims Act allows private citizens to bring suit on behalf of the United States and share in any recovery.  Momeyer will receive $1.8 million.

The Chanler Group, in association with the Hirst Law Group, represents whistleblowers who take action under the False Claims Act to report fraud committed against the federal and state governments.  We have years of experience representing whistleblower clients who expose every kind of fraud against the government, including health care fraud, contract fraud, and tax fraud.  Read more about our expertise in False Claims Act cases and how you can take action.

Source: 
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2013/March/13-civ-326.html
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. A&W Bottling Company, Inc., et al.

Date: 
October 23, 2007

On October 23, 2007, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. A&W Bottling Company, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer’s allegations that the defendant A&W Bottling Company, Inc. (“A&W”) sold glass bottles with painted exterior decorations containing the heavy metal lead on the exterior in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings. 

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
A&W Bottling Company, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Used By: 
Adult/Child Use
Cross-Post On: 
None

DiPirro v. A. Tool Shed, Inc., et al.

Date: 
December 13, 2000

On December 13, 2000, citizen enforcer Michael DiPirro and settling party A. Tool Shed, Inc. entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved DiPirro's allegations that ATS sold certain welding products whose customary use and application may produce fumes or gases which contain formaldehyde, chromium (hexavalent compounds), carbon monoxide, nickel (and nickel compounds), and/or lead (and lead compounds) in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
DiPirro
Defendant: 
A. Tool Shed, Inc.
Type: 
Out-Of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Warnings
Monetary: 
$10,000-$19,999
Used By: 
Adult Use
Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content