Proposition 65

Brimer v. Rocking P, Inc. and River's Edge Products

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
October 4, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On October 4, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendants Rocking P, Inc. and River's Edge Products (collectively "Defendants") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that the Defendants sold light sets with cords containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconRockingP_Full.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Rocking P, Inc. and River's Edge Products
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$10,000-$19,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Richards Homewares, Incorporated

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
September 1, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On September 1, 2011, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Richards Homewares, Incorporated ("Richards Homewares") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Richards Homewares sold hanging storage shelves made with materials containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconRichards.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Richards Homewares, Incorporated
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings, Vendor Notification
Monetary: 
$30,000 - $39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Office Depot, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
June 1, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Stationery and Office Fasteners, Tools & Supplies
Featured: 
No

On June 1, 2012, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Office Depot, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant, Office Depot, Inc. ("Office Depot"), sold colored vinyl-coated paper fasteners containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconOffice Depot_CJ_executed.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Office Depot, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$230,000-$239,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Logo Chair, Incorporated et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
July 22, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Exercise/Fitness and Sporting Equipment/Accessories
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On July 22, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Logo Chair Incorporated, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Logo Chair, Incorporated ("Logo Chair") sold folding chairs containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconLogo Chair.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Logo Chairs, Incorporated, et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$170,000 ? 179,000
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Kingsbridge International, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
November 20, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Hardware, Woodworking Power/Machine and Hand Tools
Featured: 
No

On November 20, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Kingsbridge International, Inc. ("Kingsbridge"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Kingsbridge sold tools with grips containing the heavy metal lead and the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconKingsbridge_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Kingsbridge International, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$40,000-$49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties, Cy Pres
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Inventory Liquidators Corp.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
March 29, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On March 29, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Inventory Liquidators Corp. ("ILC") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that ILC sold flashlights containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconInventory_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Inventory Liquidators Corp.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Howard Berger Company Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
May 11, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On May 11, 2011, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Howard Berger Company, Inc.; et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Howard Berger Company Inc. ("Howard") sold work lights with clamp handles containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconROS_HowardBerger_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Howard Berger Company Inc, et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$60,000 - $69,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Hopkins Manufacturing Corp. and Carrand Companies, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
April 29, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On April 29, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Hopkins Manufacturing Corp; et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendants Hopkins Manufacturing Corp. ("Hopkins") and Carrand Companies, Inc. ("Carrand") sold padlocks containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconHopkins.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Hopkins Manufacturing Corp. and Carrand Companies, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Giftcraft, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
September 15, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Decorated Glassware & Ceramicware
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On September 15, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Proposition 65 Settlement and Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Giftcraft Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Giftcraft, Inc. ("Giftcraft") sold glass rain gauges containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconGiftcraft.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Giftcraft, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. G&S Metal Products Corporation, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
June 29, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On June 29, 2011, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. G&S Metal Products Corporation, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant G&S Metal Products Corporation, Inc. ("G&S") sold vinyl-coated wire containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconG&S Metal.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
G&S Corporation, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, warnings
Monetary: 
$50,000-$59,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content