Proposition 65

Held v. DeLorme Publishing Company; Rodco Enterprises; et al.

Date: 
September 19, 2012

On September 19, 2012, the Marin County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Held v. DeLorme Publishing Company, Inc., et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E.'s allegations that the defendants Rodco Enterprises and DeLorme Publishing Company ("Rodco and DeLorme") sold pouches containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Rodco Enterprises; DeLorme Publishing Company
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Englander v. Dexter-Russell, Inc.

Date: 
September 25, 2012

On September 25, 2012, citizen enforcer Peter Englander and settling defendant Dexter-Russell, Inc. ("Dexter-Russell") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Englander's allegations that Dexter-Russell sold cutlery cases exposing people to the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Englander
Defendant: 
Dexter-Russell
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Tofasco of America, Inc.

Date: 
August 28, 2012

On August 28, 2012, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Tofasco of America, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Tofasco of America, Inc. ("Tofasco") sold folding chairs containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Tofasco of America, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$30,000 - $39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Tiger Accessory Group LLC

Date: 
December 6, 2011

On December 6, 2011, the Marin County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Tiger Accessory Group LLC, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Tiger Accessory Group LLC ("Tiger") sold dusters with handles containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Tiger Accessory Group LLC
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings, VendorNotification
Monetary: 
$50,000 - $59,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. The Northwest Company LLC

Industry Categories: 

On December 28, 2011, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant The Northwest Company LLC ("TNC"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that TNC sold steering wheel covers containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
The Northwest Company LLC
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. The Manual Woodworkers & Weavers, Inc.

Date: 
October 29, 2011
Industry Categories: 

On October 29, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. The Manual Woodworkers & Weavers, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant The Manual Woodworkers & Weavers, Inc. ("Manual Woodworkers") sold tote bags that exposed users to the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
The Manual Woodworkers & Weavers, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$30,000 - $39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Tablecraft Products Company, Inc.

Date: 
May 15, 2012

On May 15, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Tablecraft Products Company, Inc. ("Tablecraft") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Tablecraft sold kitchen tools with grips containing the heavy metal lead and/or phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Tablecraft Products Company, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Warnings, Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Sunny Designs, Inc.

Date: 
December 13, 2011

On December 13, 2011, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Sunny Designs, Incorporated ("Sunny Designs") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Sunny Designs sold stools containing the heavy metal lead and the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Sunny Designs, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Staples, Inc., et al.

Date: 
June 8, 2012
Industry Categories: 

On June 8, 2012, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Staples, Inc., et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant, Staples, Inc. ("Staples"), sold laptop computer bags containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Staples, Inc., et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. SBI Incorporated

Date: 
March 18, 2011

On March 18, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. SBI Incorporated, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant SBI Incorporated ("SBI") sold watering gun/nozzles with grips containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
SBI Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$40,000-$49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content