Proposition 65

Held v. Shalom International Corp., et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
January 13, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On January 13, 2012, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Held v. Shalom; et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Anthony Held, Ph.D., P.E.'s allegations that the defendant Shalom International Corporation ("Shalom") sold tote bags containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite Proposition 65 warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconROS_Attach_Shalom.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Shalom International Corp., et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Rite Aid Corporation

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On July 31, 2012, citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E. and settling defendant Rite Aid Corporation ("Rite Aid") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Held's allegations that Rite Aid sold battery powered light strands with wires that contain the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconRite Aid_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Rite Aid Corporation
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
February 1, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On February 1, 2012, the Marin County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Held v. Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E.'s allegations that the defendant Panasonic Corporation of North America ("Panasonic"), sold toiletry cases and bags containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconPanasonic_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Panasonic Corporation of North America; et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Nina Footwear, Inc. and Mamiye Brothers, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
February 27, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Children's Apparel and Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On February 27, 2012, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered an Amended Consent Judgment in Held v. S. Goldberg and Co., Inc., et al., which allowed defendants Nina Footwear, Inc. ("Nina") and Mamiye Brothers, Inc. ("Mamiye"), to opt-in to the original Consent Judgment, dated August 20, 2010, resolving citizen enforcer Anthony E.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconSG ROS Corrected.pdf
application/pdf iconnina_and_mamiye.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Nina Footwear, Inc. and Mamiye Brothers, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation; Warnings
Monetary: 
$20,000 - $29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Kmart Corporation

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
January 20, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Children's Toys
Featured: 
No

On January 20, 2011, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Held v. Kmart Corporation, which resolved citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E.'s allegations that the defendant Kmart Corporation ("Kmart"), sold children's vinyl bathroom animal toys containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconKmart.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Kmart Corporation
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$10,000 - $19,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Kalan LP

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On July 7, 2011, citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E. and settling defendant Kalan LP ("Kalan") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Held's allegations that Kalan sold key covers containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconKalan_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Kalan LP
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$10,000-$19,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Hot Topic, Inc.; et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
August 22, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On August 22, 2012, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Held v. Hot Topic, Inc.; et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Anthony Held, Ph.D., P.E.'s allegations that the defendant T.U.K., Inc. ("T.U.K.") sold footwear containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconTUK_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
T.U.K., Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$40,000 - $49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Idea Nuova, Incorporated, et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
June 8, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On June 8, 2012, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Held v. Idea Nuova, Inc.; et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Anthony Held, Ph.D., P.E.'s allegations that the defendant Idea Nuova Inc. ("Idea Nuova") sold tote bags in the State of California containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconIdea Nuova2011.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Idea Nuova, Incorporated, et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$40,000 - $49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Global Design Concepts, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
February 6, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Healthcare Products
Featured: 
No

On  February 6, 2012, citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E. and settling defendant Global Design Concepts, Inc. ("Global"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Held's allegations that Global sold women's handbags containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconGlobal_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Global Design Concepts, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$10,000-$19,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Gemmy Industries Corporation

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
July 16, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On July 16, 2012, citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E. and settling defendant Gemmy Industries Corporation ("Gemmy") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Held's allegations that Gemmy sold shower curtains containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconGemmy_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Gemmy Industries Corporation
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content