Proposition 65

Moore v. Trade Associates Group, Ltd.

Date: 
August 22, 2012

On August 22, 2012, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Moore v. Trade Associates Group, Ltd., which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore's allegations that the defendant Trade Associates Group, Ltd. ("Trade Associates") sold coverings for books containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Trade Associates, Ltd.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000 - $39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Torin Jacks, Inc.

Date: 
June 7, 2012

On June 7, 2012, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Moore v. Torin Jacks, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore's allegations that the defendant Torin Jacks, Inc. ("Torin") sold stools containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Torin Jacks, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$20,000 - $29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Three Hands Corporation

Date: 
December 12, 2011

On December 12, 2011, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Moore v. Three Hands Corporation, which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore's allegations that the defendant Three Hands Corporation ("Three Hands") sold storage furniture containing the phthalate chemicals di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP), butyl benzyl phthalate ("BBP"), di-n-butyl phthalate ("DBP"), and the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Three Hands Corporation
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$50,000 - $59,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Swift Distribution, Inc.

Date: 
August 29, 2012

On August 29, 2012, citizen enforcer John Moore and settling defendant Swift Distribution, Inc. ("Swift") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Moore's allegations that Swift sold keyboard benches with vinyl seats containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Swift Distribution, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Spirit Products, Limited

Date: 
November 30, 2011

On November 30, 2011, citizen enforcer John Moore and settling defendant Spirit Products, Limited ("Spirit"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Moore's allegations that Spirit sold identification cases containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Spirit Products, Ltd.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Smart & Final Stores, LLC

Date: 
October 12, 2012
Industry Categories: 

On October 12, 2012, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Moore v. Smart & Final Stores, LLC, which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore's allegations that the defendant Smart & Final Stores, LLC ("S&F") sold aprons containing the phthalate chemicals di-n-butyl phthalate ("DBP") and di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Smart & Final Stores, LLC.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Ross Stores, Inc.

On November 1, 2012, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Moore v. Ross Stores, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore's allegations that the defendant Ross Stores, Inc. ("Ross"), sold ottomans containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Ross Stores, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Supplier Certification
Monetary: 
$50,000-$59,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Raymond Geddes & Company, Inc.

Date: 
June 24, 2012

On June 24, 2012, citizen enforcer John Moore and settling defendant Raymond Geddes & Company, Inc. ("RGC"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Moore's allegations that RGC sold pencil cases/pouches, key chains, and rulers containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Raymond Geddes & Company, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Prym Consumer USA Inc.

Date: 
February 15, 2012

On February 15, 2012, citizen enforcer John Moore and settling defendant Prym Consumer USA Inc. ("Prym") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Moore's allegations that Prym sold handle adapters with grips containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Prym Consumer USA Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Paris Business Products, Inc., et al.

Date: 
March 21, 2011

On March 21, 2011, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Moore v. Paris Business Products Inc., et al., which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore's allegations that the defendant Paris Business Products, Inc. ("Paris") sold books with soft covers containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Paris Business Products, Inc. et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content