Prop 65 Warning

Brimer v. Inventory Liquidators Corp.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
March 29, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On March 29, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Inventory Liquidators Corp. ("ILC") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that ILC sold flashlights containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconInventory_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Inventory Liquidators Corp.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Howard Berger Company Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
May 11, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On May 11, 2011, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Howard Berger Company, Inc.; et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Howard Berger Company Inc. ("Howard") sold work lights with clamp handles containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconROS_HowardBerger_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Howard Berger Company Inc, et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$60,000 - $69,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Hopkins Manufacturing Corp. and Carrand Companies, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
April 29, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On April 29, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Hopkins Manufacturing Corp; et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendants Hopkins Manufacturing Corp. ("Hopkins") and Carrand Companies, Inc. ("Carrand") sold padlocks containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconHopkins.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Hopkins Manufacturing Corp. and Carrand Companies, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Giftcraft, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
September 15, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Decorated Glassware & Ceramicware
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On September 15, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Proposition 65 Settlement and Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Giftcraft Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Giftcraft, Inc. ("Giftcraft") sold glass rain gauges containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconGiftcraft.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Giftcraft, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. G&S Metal Products Corporation, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
June 29, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On June 29, 2011, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. G&S Metal Products Corporation, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant G&S Metal Products Corporation, Inc. ("G&S") sold vinyl-coated wire containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconG&S Metal.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
G&S Corporation, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, warnings
Monetary: 
$50,000-$59,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Franklin Sports, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
November 1, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On November 1, 2011, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Franklin Sports, Inc. ("Franklin"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Franklin sold baseball uniform belts composed of material containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the health hazard warnings required by Proposition 65.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconFranklinSports_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Franklin Sports, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Fortune Bands, Inc. and Master Lock Company LLC, et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
January 9, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On January 9, 2012, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Fortune Bands, Inc. and Master Lock Company LLC, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendants, Fortune Bands, Inc. and Master Lock Company LLC ("Fortune and Master"), sold storage bags containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconFortune_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Fortune Bands, Inc. and Master Lock Company LLC, et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$40,000 -$49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Dixon Ticonderoga Company

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
August 20, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Stationery and Office Fasteners, Tools & Supplies
Featured: 
No

On August 20, 2012, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer and settling defendant Dixon Ticonderoga Company ("Dixon") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Brimer's allegations that Dixon sold pen pouches containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconROS_Attach_Dixon.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Dixon Ticonderoga Company
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. Dollar Empire, LLC

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
June 22, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Stationery and Office Fasteners, Tools & Supplies
Featured: 
No

On June 22, 2011, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Dollar Empire, LLC, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Dollar Empire, LLC ("Dollar Empire") sold vinyl-coated paper fasteners in the State of California containing the heavy metal lead without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconROS_Attach_Dollar_Empire.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
Dollar Empire, LLC
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$10,000-$19,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Brimer v. CVS Pharmacy Incorporated, et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
August 8, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Hardware, Woodworking Power/Machine and Hand Tools
Featured: 
No

On August 9, 2011, the Marin County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. CVS Pharmacy Incorporated, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant CVS Pharmacy Incorporated ("CVS") distributed and/or sold flashlights containing the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconCVS_flashlights.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer
Defendant: 
CVS Pharmacy Incorporated, et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$40,000-$49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content