Prop 65 Warning

Held v. The Kitchen Collection, LLC, et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
June 26, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Children's Toys
Featured: 
No

On June 26, 2012, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Held v. The Kitchen Collection, LLC, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E.'s allegations that the defendant The Kitchen Collection, LLC ("TKC"), sold children's bags containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconTKC_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
The Kitchen Collection, et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Tri-Coastal Design Group, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
October 11, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On October 11, 2011, citizen enforcer Anthony Held, Ph.D., P.E. and settling defendant Tri-Coastal Design Group, Inc. ("Tri-Coastal"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Held's allegations that Tri-Coastal sold belts and handbags containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconTri-Coastal Design.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Tri-Coastal Design Group, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Staples, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
April 13, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Stationery and Office Fasteners, Tools & Supplies
Featured: 
No

On April 13, 2011, the Sacramento County Superior Court entered a Supplemental Consent Judgment in Held v. Staples, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E.'s allegations that the defendant Staples, Inc. ("Staples") sold pencil pouches/cases containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconStaples_ROJ_Attach_Supplemental.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Staples, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$90,000-$99,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Sky High International, L.L.C.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
May 6, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On May 6, 2011, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Held v. Sky High International, L.L.C., which resolved citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E.'s allegations that the defendant Sky High International, L.L.C. ("Sky High") sold vinyl magnets and bookmarks containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconSky High_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Sky High International, L.L.C.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$40,000-$49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Shalom International Corp., et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
January 13, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On January 13, 2012, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Held v. Shalom; et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Anthony Held, Ph.D., P.E.'s allegations that the defendant Shalom International Corporation ("Shalom") sold tote bags containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite Proposition 65 warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconROS_Attach_Shalom.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Shalom International Corp., et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Rite Aid Corporation

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On July 31, 2012, citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E. and settling defendant Rite Aid Corporation ("Rite Aid") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Held's allegations that Rite Aid sold battery powered light strands with wires that contain the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconRite Aid_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Rite Aid Corporation
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
February 1, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On February 1, 2012, the Marin County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Held v. Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E.'s allegations that the defendant Panasonic Corporation of North America ("Panasonic"), sold toiletry cases and bags containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconPanasonic_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Panasonic Corporation of North America; et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Kmart Corporation

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
January 20, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Children's Toys
Featured: 
No

On January 20, 2011, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Held v. Kmart Corporation, which resolved citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E.'s allegations that the defendant Kmart Corporation ("Kmart"), sold children's vinyl bathroom animal toys containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconKmart.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Kmart Corporation
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$10,000 - $19,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Kalan LP

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On July 7, 2011, citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E. and settling defendant Kalan LP ("Kalan") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Held's allegations that Kalan sold key covers containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconKalan_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Kalan LP
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$10,000-$19,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Hot Topic, Inc.; et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
August 22, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On August 22, 2012, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Held v. Hot Topic, Inc.; et al., which resolved citizen enforcer Anthony Held, Ph.D., P.E.'s allegations that the defendant T.U.K., Inc. ("T.U.K.") sold footwear containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconTUK_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
T.U.K., Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$40,000 - $49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content