Prop 65 Warning

Moore v. Ross Stores, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On November 1, 2012, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Moore v. Ross Stores, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore's allegations that the defendant Ross Stores, Inc. ("Ross"), sold ottomans containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconRoss_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Ross Stores, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Supplier Certification
Monetary: 
$50,000-$59,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Raymond Geddes & Company, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
June 24, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Stationery and Office Fasteners, Tools & Supplies
Featured: 
No

On June 24, 2012, citizen enforcer John Moore and settling defendant Raymond Geddes & Company, Inc. ("RGC"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Moore's allegations that RGC sold pencil cases/pouches, key chains, and rulers containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconRaymond Geddes_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Raymond Geddes & Company, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Prym Consumer USA Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
February 15, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Hardware, Woodworking Power/Machine and Hand Tools
Featured: 
No

On February 15, 2012, citizen enforcer John Moore and settling defendant Prym Consumer USA Inc. ("Prym") entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Moore's allegations that Prym sold handle adapters with grips containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconPrym_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Prym Consumer USA Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Paris Business Products, Inc., et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
March 21, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Stationery and Office Fasteners, Tools & Supplies
Featured: 
No

On March 21, 2011, the San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Moore v. Paris Business Products Inc., et al., which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore's allegations that the defendant Paris Business Products, Inc. ("Paris") sold books with soft covers containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconParis Business.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Paris Business Products, Inc. et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Pier 1 Imports, Incorporated

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
October 26, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Craft and Hobby Supplies, Tools, and Lead Balancing Weights
Hardware, Woodworking Power/Machine and Hand Tools
Featured: 
No

On October 26, 2011, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Moore v. Pier 1 Imports, Inc., which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore's allegations that the defendant, Pier 1 Imports, Inc. ("Pier 1"), sold vinyl coated tape measures that exposed users to the heavy metal lead and travel bags with zipper pulls which exposed users to the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconPier 1.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Pier 1 Imports, Incorporated
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$40,000-$49,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Paris Accessories, Inc.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
July 11, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

On July 11, 2011, citizen enforcer John Moore and settling defendant Paris Accessories, Inc. ("Paris Accessories"), entered into an out-of-court Settlement Agreement, which resolved Moore's allegations that Paris Accessories sold footwear containing the phthalate chemicals di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") and di-n-butyl phthalate ("DBP") in the State of California without providing the health hazard warnings required by Proposition 65.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconParis Accessories_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Paris Accessories, Inc.
Type: 
Out-of-Court Settlement
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000 - $29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Novalis International, LTD and Novalis International, LLC

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
August 4, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On August 4, 2011, the Marin County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Moore v. Novalis International, LTD and Novalis International, LLC, which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore's allegations that the defendants Novalis International, LTD and Novalis International, LLC (collectively "Novalis") sold vinyl flooring containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconNovalis_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Novalis International, LTD and Novalis International, LLC
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$70,000 - $79,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Ms. Dee, Inc., et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
September 25, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Children's Apparel and Fashion Accessories
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Stationery and Office Fasteners, Tools & Supplies
Featured: 
No

On September 25, 2012, the Marin County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Moore v. Ms. Dee, Inc., et al., which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore's allegations that defendant Ms. Dee, Inc. ("Ms. Dee"), sold coverings for books/journals, marker pouches, and bracelets containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconMs. Dee_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Ms. Dee, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Natco Products Corporation, et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
April 7, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On April 7, 2011, the Marin County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Moore v. Natco Products Corporation, which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore's allegations that the defendant Natco Products Corporation ("Natco") sold vinyl tile flooring, vinyl floor runners and protectors, and vinyl mats containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") and vinyl cargo mats containing DEHP and the heavy metal lead in the State of California without providing the requisite Proposition 65 health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconNatco CJ FINAL.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Natco Products Corporation
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$200,000 - $209,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None

Moore v. Ludlow Composites Corporation, et al.

Submitted by T324Admin on February 11, 2013
Date: 
August 31, 2011
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

On August 31, 2011, the Marin County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Moore v. Ludlow Composites, which resolved citizen enforcer John Moore's allegations that the defendant Ludlow Composites Corporation ("Ludlow") sold vinyl flooring containing the phthalate chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ("DEHP") in the State of California without providing the requisite health hazard warnings.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconLudlow_ROS_Attach.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Moore
Defendant: 
Ludlow Composites Corporation, et al.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Warnings
Monetary: 
$70,000 - $79,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults
Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content