Prop 65 California

Brimer et al. v. D.W.L. International Trading Inc.

Submitted by chirst on June 5, 2013
Date: 
October 23, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Hardware, Woodworking Power/Machine and Hand Tools
Featured: 
No

The Honorable Mark H. Pierce of the Santa Clara County Superior Court granted the parties’ motion to approve the Consent Judgment in the case Brimer et al. v. 3M Company, et al., on October 23, 2012.  This enforcement action resolved citizen enforcers Russell Brimer, John Moore, and Peter Englander’s allegations that sixteen defendants, including D.W.L. International Trading Inc. and Winco Industries Co.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconbrimermooreenglanderv.handtoolgroup102312.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Brimer, Moore, Englander
Defendant: 
D.W.L. International Trading Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Vendor Notification
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held et al. v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.

Submitted by chirst on May 24, 2013
Date: 
March 7, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

The Honorable Roy O. Chernus of the Marin County Superior Court granted the parties’ motion to approve the Consent Judgment in the case Held et al. v. Alticor, Inc., et al., on March 7, 2012.  This enforcement action resolved citizen enforcers John Moore and Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E.’s allegations that eighteen defendants sold products containing phthalate chemicals, including the defendant Williams-Sonoma, Inc.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconheldmoorev.alticor030712.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Moore, Held
Defendant: 
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Vendor Notification
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held et al. v. Tommy Bahamas Group, Inc., et al.

Submitted by chirst on May 24, 2013
Date: 
March 7, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Featured: 
No

The Honorable Roy O. Chernus of the Marin County Superior Court granted the parties’ motion to approve the Consent Judgment in the case Held et al. v. Alticor, Inc., et al., on March 7, 2012.  This enforcement action resolved citizen enforcers John Moore and Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E.’s allegations that eighteen defendants sold products containing phthalate chemicals, including the defendants Tommy Bahama Group, Inc. and Oxford Industries, Inc.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconheldmoorev.alticor030712.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Moore, Held
Defendant: 
Tommy Bahama Group, Inc. and Oxford Industries, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Vendor Notification
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held et al. v. Michaels Stores, Inc., et al.

Submitted by chirst on May 24, 2013
Date: 
March 7, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Computers and Electronics
Craft and Hobby Supplies, Tools, and Lead Balancing Weights
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

The Honorable Roy O. Chernus of the Marin County Superior Court granted the parties’ motion to approve the Consent Judgment in the case Held et al. v. Alticor, Inc., et al., on March 7, 2012.  This enforcement action resolved citizen enforcers John Moore and Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E.’s allegations that eighteen defendants sold products containing phthalate chemicals, including the defendant Michaels Stores, Inc. and its releasee Aaron Brothers, Inc.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconheldmoorev.alticor030712.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Moore, Held
Defendant: 
Michaels Stores, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Vendor Notification
Monetary: 
$80,000-$89,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held et al. v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.

Submitted by chirst on May 22, 2013
Date: 
March 7, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

The Honorable Roy O. Chernus of the Marin County Superior Court granted the parties’ motion to approve the Consent Judgment in the case Held et al. v. Alticor, Inc., et al., on March 7, 2012.  This enforcement action resolved citizen enforcers John Moore and Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E.’s allegations that eighteen defendants sold products containing phthalate chemicals, including the defendant J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. (“J.C.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconheldmoorev.alticor030712.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Moore, Held
Defendant: 
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Vendor Notification
Monetary: 
$90,000-$99,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held et al. v. Carole Fabrics Corporation

Submitted by chirst on May 22, 2013
Date: 
March 7, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

The Honorable Roy O. Chernus of the Marin County Superior Court granted the parties’ motion to approve the Consent Judgment in the case Held et al. v. Alticor, Inc., et al., on March 7, 2012.  This enforcement action resolved citizen enforcers John Moore and Anthony E.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconheldmoorev.alticor030712.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Moore, Held
Defendant: 
Carole Fabrics Corporation
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Vendor Notification
Monetary: 
$20,000-$29,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. RG Costumes & Accessories, Inc.

Submitted by chirst on April 25, 2013
Date: 
October 2, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

The Chanler Group’s groundbreaking case against fifteen manufacturers, distributors, and sellers of Halloween products for children and adults was resolved on October 2, 2012, when the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Held v. Forum Novelties, Inc. et al.  The Halloween Group enforcement action resolved citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E.’s allegations that the defendant RG Costumes & Accessories, Inc.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconheldv.halloweengroup100212.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
RG Costumes & Accessories, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Vendor Notification
Monetary: 
$50,000-$59,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. R.H. Smith & Sons Ltd. dba Smiffy's

Submitted by chirst on April 25, 2013
Date: 
October 2, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

The Chanler Group’s groundbreaking case against fifteen manufacturers, distributors, and sellers of Halloween products for children and adults was resolved on October 2, 2012, when the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Held v. Forum Novelties, Inc. et al.  The Halloween Group  enforcement action resolved citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E.’s allegations that the defendant R.H. Smith & Sons (Wigmakers) Ltd. dba Smiffy’s (“R.H.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconheldv.halloweengroup100212.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
R.H. Smith & Sons dba Smiffy's
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Vendor Notification
Monetary: 
$50,000-$59,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Paper Magic Group, Inc.

Submitted by chirst on April 25, 2013
Date: 
October 2, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

The Chanler Group’s groundbreaking case against fifteen manufacturers, distributors, and sellers of Halloween products for children and adults was resolved on October 2, 2012, when the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Held v. Forum Novelties, Inc. et al.  The Halloween Group enforcement action resolved citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E.’s allegations that the defendant Paper Magic Group, Inc. and its downstream releasee CSS Industries, Inc.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconheldv.halloweengroup100212.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Paper Magic Group, Inc.
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Vendor Notification
Monetary: 
$50,000-$59,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None

Held v. Morbid Industries

Submitted by chirst on April 25, 2013
Date: 
October 2, 2012
Industry Categories: 
Apparel & Fashion Accessories
Furniture, Home Decorative, and Household Products
Featured: 
No

The Chanler Group’s groundbreaking case against fifteen manufacturers, distributors, and sellers of Halloween products for children and adults was resolved on October 2, 2012, when the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Held v. Forum Novelties, Inc. et al.  The Halloween Group enforcement action resolved citizen enforcer Anthony E. Held, Ph.D., P.E.’s allegations that the defendant Morbid Industries, Inc.

Case PDF: 
application/pdf iconheldv.halloweengroup100212.pdf
Plaintiff: 
Held
Defendant: 
Morbid Industries
Type: 
Consent Judgment
Relief: 
Reformulation, Vendor Notification
Monetary: 
$30,000-$39,999
Monetary Relief: 
Civil Penalties
Used By: 
Adults/Children
Cross-Post On: 
None
Syndicate content