Tableware
July 1, 2005
The San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in the case of Leeman v. Dan-Dee International Limited, et al., on July 1, 2005, which resolved citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman's allegations that defendant Dan-Dee International Limited ("Dan-Dee") manufactured, distributed and/or sold certain ceramicware and other tableware products with colored...
Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Dan-Dee International Limited, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Leeman, Proposition 65
February 6, 2006
Dakota Brothers, Inc. d/b/a Marina Food (Cupertino) elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 6, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Dakota Brothers, Inc. d/b/a Marina Food (Cupertino), Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
November 21, 2005
Crystal Clear Industries elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 21, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Crystal Clear Industries, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
April 12, 2006
The Cricket Company, LLC elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer, The Cricket Company, LLC
December 28, 2005
Creative Merchandising Ideas dba Crazy Mountain Imports elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 28, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Creative Merchandising Ideas dba Crazy Mountain Imports, Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
February 8, 2006
Corporate Express, Inc. and Corporate Express Promotional Products, Inc. (collectively "Corporate Express") elected to address their Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on February 8, 2006. In doing so, Corporate Express...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Corporate Express Promotional Products, Inc., Corporate Express, Inc., Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
January 11, 2006
Coronado Brewing Co. Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 11, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Coronado Brewing Co. Inc., Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
November 10, 2005
Coors and Company, Coors Global Properties, Inc. and Coors Brewing Company (collectively "Coors") elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on November 10, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Coors and Company, Coors Brewing Company, Coors Global Properties, Inc., Glass Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
October 19, 2005
Cooper's Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on October 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Cooper's Inc., Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
December 27, 2005
Constellation Brands, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 27, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
Boelter, Cadmium, Ceramic Food & Beverage Products, Ceramic Non-Food & Beverage Products, Constellation Brands, Inc., Glass Food & Beverage Products, Glass Non-Food & Beverage Products, Lead, Proposition 65, Russell Brimer
Search Our Site
Subscribe to Our Blogs
Sign up for our newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest important news from The Chanler Group
Contact Our Team
Use our online contact form, or visit our offices page for more details on how to reach us.
Want to apply for a grant? Check out our Grant Seeker FAQ.
If you want to contact a whistleblower attorney, please take a look at our Whistleblower Questionnaire.