The San Francisco County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Leeman v. Mikasa, Inc, et al. on August 31, 2004. The settlement resolved the allegations of citizen enforcer Whitney R. Leeman, Ph.D. that defendant Mikasa, Inc. sold certain glassware products containing colored designs or decorations with materials that contain lead and cadmium in the State of California...
Michaels Stores, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on May 5, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
Metropark USA, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on January 6, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
MeadWestvaco Corporation elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals...
On January 10, 2008, the Santa Clara County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. McLaughlin Supermarket; Story Supermarket, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that defendants McLaughlin Supermarket and Story Supermarket (collectively "McLaughlin") distributed and/or sold shot glasses and other glassware and mugs and...
The Honorable Ronald E. Quidachay of the San Francisco Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on May 1, 2006, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant McIlhenny Company ("McIlhenny") sold mugs and other glass and ceramic tableware with colored artwork on the exterior surface containing the heavy metal lead and/or cadmium...
McCormick & Company, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on December 19, 2005. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead...
The Oakland branch of the Alameda County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment on December 13, 2006, in Brimer v. McCaulou's Department Store; Ganz, Inc. In this enforcement action, citizen enforcer Russell Brimer alleged that the defendants McCaulou's, Inc., ("McCoulou's") and Ganz, Inc. ("Ganz") sold glassware, mugs, and other tableware...
On April 4, 2008, the San Luis Obispo County Superior Court entered a Consent Judgment in Brimer v. Martin & Weyrich Winery, LLC, which resolved citizen enforcer Russell Brimer's allegations that the defendant Martin & Weyrich Winery, LLC ("Martin & Weyrich") sold wine glasses and other glass beverageware with colored artwork containing lead on their...
Marek, Inc. elected to address its Proposition 65 liability by opting into the terms of the Consent Judgment entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of Russell Brimer v. The Boelter Companies, et al. on April 12, 2006. In doing so, it became a member of a class of settling defendants who agreed to virtually eliminate the heavy metals lead and cadmium...
